Light
Dark
System
Log In
Loading...
Compare / EASA/
Incorporated Amendments
/
Compare & Highlight Differences
AMC1 ORO.FTL.205(f) Flight Duty Period (FDP)
Available versions for ERULES-1963177438-12077
ED Decision 2014/017/R
found in: Air Operations (965/2012) Part-ARO Part-ORO Part-CAT Part-SPA Part-NCC Part-NCO Part-SPO (Sep 2023)
From
Air Operations Rev... (Mar 2026)
Air Operations (96... (Feb 2025)
Air Operations (96... (Sep 2023)
From section
To
Air Operations Rev... (Mar 2026)
Air Operations (96... (Feb 2025)
Air Operations (96... (Sep 2023)
To section
No visible text changes
0 removals
0 additions
View
Rich
Plain
Sync scrolling
Share
From
Show details
Hide details
To
Show details
Hide details
Version
Show side by side
AMC1 ORO.FTL.205(f) Flight Duty Period (FDP) ED Decision 2014/017/R UNFORESEEN CIRCUMSTANCES IN ACTUAL FLIGHT OPERATIONS — COMMANDER’S DISCRETION (a) As general guidance when developing a commander’s discretion policy, the operator should take into consideration the shared responsibility of management, flight and cabin crew in the case of unforeseen circumstances. The exercise of commander’s discretion should be considered exceptional and should be avoided at home base and/or company hubs where standby or reserve crew members should be available. Operators should asses on a regular basis the series of pairings where commander’s discretion has been exercised in order to be aware of possible inconsistencies in their rostering. (b) The operator’s policy on commander’s discretion should state the safety objectives, especially in the case of an extended FDP or reduced rest and should take due consideration of additional factors that might decrease a crew member’s alertness levels, such as: (1) WOCL encroachment; (2) weather conditions; (3) complexity of the operation and/or airport environment; (4) aeroplane malfunctions or specifications; (5) flight with training or supervisory duties; (6) increased number of sectors; (7) circadian disruption; and (8) individual conditions of affected crew members (time since awake, sleep-related factor, workload, etc.).
AMC1 ORO.FTL.205(f) Flight Duty Period (FDP) ED Decision 2014/017/R UNFORESEEN CIRCUMSTANCES IN ACTUAL FLIGHT OPERATIONS — COMMANDER’S DISCRETION (a) As general guidance when developing a commander’s discretion policy, the operator should take into consideration the shared responsibility of management, flight and cabin crew in the case of unforeseen circumstances. The exercise of commander’s discretion should be considered exceptional and should be avoided at home base and/or company hubs where standby or reserve crew members should be available. Operators should asses on a regular basis the series of pairings where commander’s discretion has been exercised in order to be aware of possible inconsistencies in their rostering. (b) The operator’s policy on commander’s discretion should state the safety objectives, especially in the case of an extended FDP or reduced rest and should take due consideration of additional factors that might decrease a crew member’s alertness levels, such as: (1) WOCL encroachment; (2) weather conditions; (3) complexity of the operation and/or airport environment; (4) aeroplane malfunctions or specifications; (5) flight with training or supervisory duties; (6) increased number of sectors; (7) circadian disruption; and (8) individual conditions of affected crew members (time since awake, sleep-related factor, workload, etc.).
##### AMC1 ORO.FTL.205(f) Flight Duty Period (FDP) *ED Decision 2014/017/R* **UNFORESEEN CIRCUMSTANCES IN ACTUAL FLIGHT OPERATIONS — COMMANDER’S DISCRETION** (a) As general guidance when developing a commander’s discretion policy, the operator should take into consideration the shared responsibility of management, flight and cabin crew in the case of unforeseen circumstances. The exercise of commander’s discretion should be considered exceptional and should be avoided at home base and/or company hubs where standby or reserve crew members should be available. Operators should asses on a regular basis the series of pairings where commander’s discretion has been exercised in order to be aware of possible inconsistencies in their rostering. (b) The operator’s policy on commander’s discretion should state the safety objectives, especially in the case of an extended FDP or reduced rest and should take due consideration of additional factors that might decrease a crew member’s alertness levels, such as: (1) WOCL encroachment; (2) weather conditions; (3) complexity of the operation and/or airport environment; (4) aeroplane malfunctions or specifications; (5) flight with training or supervisory duties; (6) increased number of sectors; (7) circadian disruption; and (8) individual conditions of affected crew members (time since awake, sleep-related factor, workload, etc.).