GM4 ORO.GEN.200(a)(3) Management system

• ED Decision 2017/007/R found in: Air Operations (965/2012) Part-ARO Part-ORO Part-CAT Part-SPA Part-NCC Part-NCO Part-SPO (Feb 2025)

GM4 ORO.GEN.200(a)(3) Management system ED Decision 2017/007/R COMPLEX ORGANISATIONS — SAFETY RISK MANAGEMENT — INTERFACES BETWEEN ORGANISATIONS (a) Hazard identification and risk assessment start with an identification of all parties involved in the arrangement, including independent experts and non-approved organisations. It extends to the overall control structure, assessing, in particular, the following elements across all subcontract levels and all parties within such arrangements: (1) coordination and interfaces between the different parties; (2) applicable procedures; (3) communication between all parties involved, including reporting and feedback channels; (4) task allocation responsibilities and authorities; and (5) qualifications and competency of key personnel. (b) Safety risk management focuses on the following aspects: (1) clear assignment of accountability and allocation of responsibilities; (2) only one party is responsible for a specific aspect of the arrangement — no overlapping or conflicting responsibilities, in order to eliminate coordination errors; (3) existence of clear reporting lines, both for occurrence reporting and progress reporting; (4) possibility for staff to directly notify the operator of any hazard suggesting an obviously unacceptable safety risk as a result of the potential consequences of this hazard. GM4 ORO.GEN.200(a)(3) Management system ED Decision 2017/007/R COMPLEX ORGANISATIONS — SAFETY RISK MANAGEMENT — INTERFACES BETWEEN ORGANISATIONS (a) Hazard identification and risk assessment start with an identification of all parties involved in the arrangement, including independent experts and non-approved organisations. It extends to the overall control structure, assessing, in particular, the following elements across all subcontract levels and all parties within such arrangements: (1) coordination and interfaces between the different parties; (2) applicable procedures; (3) communication between all parties involved, including reporting and feedback channels; (4) task allocation responsibilities and authorities; and (5) qualifications and competency of key personnel. (b) Safety risk management focuses on the following aspects: (1) clear assignment of accountability and allocation of responsibilities; (2) only one party is responsible for a specific aspect of the arrangement — no overlapping or conflicting responsibilities, in order to eliminate coordination errors; (3) existence of clear reporting lines, both for occurrence reporting and progress reporting; (4) possibility for staff to directly notify the operator of any hazard suggesting an obviously unacceptable safety risk as a result of the potential consequences of this hazard. ##### GM4 ORO.GEN.200(a)(3) Management system *ED Decision 2017/007/R* **COMPLEX ORGANISATIONS — SAFETY RISK MANAGEMENT — INTERFACES BETWEEN ORGANISATIONS** (a) Hazard identification and risk assessment start with an identification of all parties involved in the arrangement, including independent experts and non-approved organisations. It extends to the overall control structure, assessing, in particular, the following elements across all subcontract levels and all parties within such arrangements: (1) coordination and interfaces between the different parties; (2) applicable procedures; (3) communication between all parties involved, including reporting and feedback channels; (4) task allocation responsibilities and authorities; and (5) qualifications and competency of key personnel. (b) Safety risk management focuses on the following aspects: (1) clear assignment of accountability and allocation of responsibilities; (2) only one party is responsible for a specific aspect of the arrangement — no overlapping or conflicting responsibilities, in order to eliminate coordination errors; (3) existence of clear reporting lines, both for occurrence reporting and progress reporting; (4) possibility for staff to directly notify the operator of any hazard suggesting an obviously unacceptable safety risk as a result of the potential consequences of this hazard.