Light
Dark
System
Log In
Loading...
Compare / EASA/
Incorporated Amendments
/
Compare & Highlight Differences
AMC1 ARO.GEN.300(a)(2) Oversight
Available versions for ERULES-1963177438-11805
ED Decision 2014/025/R
found in: Air Operations (965/2012) Part-ARO Part-ORO Part-CAT Part-SPA Part-NCC Part-NCO Part-SPO (Sep 2023)
From
Air Operations Rev... (Mar 2026)
Air Operations (96... (Feb 2025)
Air Operations (96... (Sep 2023)
From section
To
Air Operations Rev... (Mar 2026)
Air Operations (96... (Feb 2025)
Air Operations (96... (Sep 2023)
To section
No visible text changes
0 removals
0 additions
View
Rich
Plain
Sync scrolling
Share
From
Show details
Hide details
To
Show details
Hide details
Version
Show side by side
AMC1 ARO.GEN.300(a)(2) Oversight ED Decision 2014/025/R OPERATIONAL APPROVALS ISSUED BY NON-EU STATE OF REGISTRY When verifying continued compliance of non-commercial operators using an aircraft registered in a third country holding operational approvals for operations in PBN, MNPS and RVSM airspace issued by a non-EU State of Registry, the competent authority should at least assess if: (a) the State of registry has established an equivalent level of safety, considering any differences notified to the ICAO Standards for RVSM, RNP, MNPS and MEL; or (b) there are reservations on the safety oversight capabilities and records of the State of registry; or (c) operators of the State of registry are subject to an operating ban pursuant Regulation (EC) No 2111/2005; or (d) relevant findings on the State of registry from audits carried out under international conventions exist; or (e) relevant findings on the State of registry from other safety assessment programmes of States exist.
AMC1 ARO.GEN.300(a)(2) Oversight ED Decision 2014/025/R OPERATIONAL APPROVALS ISSUED BY NON-EU STATE OF REGISTRY When verifying continued compliance of non-commercial operators using an aircraft registered in a third country holding operational approvals for operations in PBN, MNPS and RVSM airspace issued by a non-EU State of Registry, the competent authority should at least assess if: (a) the State of registry has established an equivalent level of safety, considering any differences notified to the ICAO Standards for RVSM, RNP, MNPS and MEL; or (b) there are reservations on the safety oversight capabilities and records of the State of registry; or (c) operators of the State of registry are subject to an operating ban pursuant Regulation (EC) No 2111/2005; or (d) relevant findings on the State of registry from audits carried out under international conventions exist; or (e) relevant findings on the State of registry from other safety assessment programmes of States exist.
##### AMC1 ARO.GEN.300(a)(2) Oversight *ED Decision 2014/025/R* **OPERATIONAL APPROVALS ISSUED BY NON-EU STATE OF REGISTRY** When verifying continued compliance of non-commercial operators using an aircraft registered in a third country holding operational approvals for operations in PBN, MNPS and RVSM airspace issued by a non-EU State of Registry, the competent authority should at least assess if: (a) the State of registry has established an equivalent level of safety, considering any differences notified to the ICAO Standards for RVSM, RNP, MNPS and MEL; or (b) there are reservations on the safety oversight capabilities and records of the State of registry; or (c) operators of the State of registry are subject to an operating ban pursuant Regulation (EC) No 2111/2005; or (d) relevant findings on the State of registry from audits carried out under international conventions exist; or (e) relevant findings on the State of registry from other safety assessment programmes of States exist.
Contact support