AMC2 ARO.OPS.200 SPECIFIC APPROVAL PROCEDURE

• ED Decision 2014/025/R found in: Air Operations (965/2012) Part-ARO Part-ORO Part-CAT Part-SPA Part-NCC Part-NCO Part-SPO (Sep 2023)

AMC2 ARO.OPS.200 SPECIFIC APPROVAL PROCEDURE ED Decision 2014/025/R PROCEDURES FOR THE APPROVAL FOR REDUCED VERTICAL SEPARATION MINIMA (RVSM) OPERATIONS (a) When verifying compliance with the applicable requirements of Subpart D of Annex V (SPA.RVSM), the competent authority should verify that: (1) each aircraft holds an adequate RVSM airworthiness approval; (2) procedures for monitoring and reporting height keeping errors have been established; (3) a training programme for the flight crew involved in these operations has been established; and (4) operating procedures have been established. (b) Demonstration flight(s) The content of the RVSM application may be sufficient to verify the aircraft performance and procedures. However, the final step of the approval process may require a demonstration flight. The competent authority may appoint an inspector for a flight in RVSM airspace to verify that all relevant procedures are applied effectively. If the performance is satisfactory, operation in RVSM airspace may be permitted. (c) Form of approval documents Each aircraft group for which the operator is granted approval should be listed in the approval. (d) Airspace monitoring For airspace, where a numerical target level of safety is prescribed, monitoring of aircraft height keeping performance in the airspace by an independent height monitoring system is necessary to verify that the prescribed level of safety is being achieved. However, an independent monitoring check of an aircraft is not a prerequisite for the grant of an RVSM approval. (1) Suspension, revocation and reinstatement of RVSM approval The incidence of height keeping errors that can be tolerated in an RVSM environment is small. It is expected of each operator to take immediate action to rectify the conditions that cause an error. The operator should report an occurrence involving poor height keeping to the competent authority within 72 hours. The report should include an initial analysis of causal factors and measures taken to prevent repeat occurrences. The need for follow-up reports should be determined by the competent authority. Occurrences that should be reported and investigated are errors of: (i) total vertical error (TVE) equal to or greater than ±90 m (±300 ft); (ii) altimeter system error (ASE) equal to or greater than ±75 m (±245 ft); and (iii) assigned altitude deviation equal to or greater than ±90 m (±300 ft). Height keeping errors fall into two broad categories: — errors caused by malfunction of aircraft equipment; and — operational errors. (2) An operator that consistently experiences errors in either category should have approval for RVSM operations suspended or revoked. If a problem is identified that is related to one specific aircraft type, then RVSM approval may be suspended or revoked for that specific type within that operator's fleet. (3) Operators’ actions: The operator should make an effective, timely response to each height keeping error. The competent authority may consider suspending or revoking RVSM approval if the operator's responses to height keeping errors are not effective or timely. The competent authority should consider the operator's past performance record in determining the action to be taken. (4) Reinstatement of approval: The operator should satisfy the competent authority that the causes of height keeping errors are understood and have been eliminated and that the operator's RVSM programmes and procedures are effective. At its discretion and to restore confidence, the competent authority may require an independent height monitoring check of affected aircraft to be performed. AMC2 ARO.OPS.200 SPECIFIC APPROVAL PROCEDURE ED Decision 2014/025/R PROCEDURES FOR THE APPROVAL FOR REDUCED VERTICAL SEPARATION MINIMA (RVSM) OPERATIONS (a) When verifying compliance with the applicable requirements of Subpart D of Annex V (SPA.RVSM), the competent authority should verify that: (1) each aircraft holds an adequate RVSM airworthiness approval; (2) procedures for monitoring and reporting height keeping errors have been established; (3) a training programme for the flight crew involved in these operations has been established; and (4) operating procedures have been established. (b) Demonstration flight(s) The content of the RVSM application may be sufficient to verify the aircraft performance and procedures. However, the final step of the approval process may require a demonstration flight. The competent authority may appoint an inspector for a flight in RVSM airspace to verify that all relevant procedures are applied effectively. If the performance is satisfactory, operation in RVSM airspace may be permitted. (c) Form of approval documents Each aircraft group for which the operator is granted approval should be listed in the approval. (d) Airspace monitoring For airspace, where a numerical target level of safety is prescribed, monitoring of aircraft height keeping performance in the airspace by an independent height monitoring system is necessary to verify that the prescribed level of safety is being achieved. However, an independent monitoring check of an aircraft is not a prerequisite for the grant of an RVSM approval. (1) Suspension, revocation and reinstatement of RVSM approval The incidence of height keeping errors that can be tolerated in an RVSM environment is small. It is expected of each operator to take immediate action to rectify the conditions that cause an error. The operator should report an occurrence involving poor height keeping to the competent authority within 72 hours. The report should include an initial analysis of causal factors and measures taken to prevent repeat occurrences. The need for follow-up reports should be determined by the competent authority. Occurrences that should be reported and investigated are errors of: (i) total vertical error (TVE) equal to or greater than ±90 m (±300 ft); (ii) altimeter system error (ASE) equal to or greater than ±75 m (±245 ft); and (iii) assigned altitude deviation equal to or greater than ±90 m (±300 ft). Height keeping errors fall into two broad categories: — errors caused by malfunction of aircraft equipment; and — operational errors. (2) An operator that consistently experiences errors in either category should have approval for RVSM operations suspended or revoked. If a problem is identified that is related to one specific aircraft type, then RVSM approval may be suspended or revoked for that specific type within that operator's fleet. (3) Operators’ actions: The operator should make an effective, timely response to each height keeping error. The competent authority may consider suspending or revoking RVSM approval if the operator's responses to height keeping errors are not effective or timely. The competent authority should consider the operator's past performance record in determining the action to be taken. (4) Reinstatement of approval: The operator should satisfy the competent authority that the causes of height keeping errors are understood and have been eliminated and that the operator's RVSM programmes and procedures are effective. At its discretion and to restore confidence, the competent authority may require an independent height monitoring check of affected aircraft to be performed. ##### AMC2 ARO.OPS.200 SPECIFIC APPROVAL PROCEDURE *ED Decision 2014/025/R* **PROCEDURES FOR THE APPROVAL FOR REDUCED VERTICAL SEPARATION MINIMA (RVSM) OPERATIONS** (a) When verifying compliance with the applicable requirements of Subpart D of Annex V (SPA.RVSM), the competent authority should verify that: (1) each aircraft holds an adequate RVSM airworthiness approval; (2) procedures for monitoring and reporting height keeping errors have been established; (3) a training programme for the flight crew involved in these operations has been established; and (4) operating procedures have been established. (b) Demonstration flight(s) The content of the RVSM application may be sufficient to verify the aircraft performance and procedures. However, the final step of the approval process may require a demonstration flight. The competent authority may appoint an inspector for a flight in RVSM airspace to verify that all relevant procedures are applied effectively. If the performance is satisfactory, operation in RVSM airspace may be permitted. (c) Form of approval documents Each aircraft group for which the operator is granted approval should be listed in the approval. (d) Airspace monitoring For airspace, where a numerical target level of safety is prescribed, monitoring of aircraft height keeping performance in the airspace by an independent height monitoring system is necessary to verify that the prescribed level of safety is being achieved. However, an independent monitoring check of an aircraft is not a prerequisite for the grant of an RVSM approval. (1) Suspension, revocation and reinstatement of RVSM approval The incidence of height keeping errors that can be tolerated in an RVSM environment is small. It is expected of each operator to take immediate action to rectify the conditions that cause an error. The operator should report an occurrence involving poor height keeping to the competent authority within 72 hours. The report should include an initial analysis of causal factors and measures taken to prevent repeat occurrences. The need for follow-up reports should be determined by the competent authority. Occurrences that should be reported and investigated are errors of: (i) total vertical error (TVE) equal to or greater than ±90 m (±300 ft); (ii) altimeter system error (ASE) equal to or greater than ±75 m (±245 ft); and (iii) assigned altitude deviation equal to or greater than ±90 m (±300 ft). Height keeping errors fall into two broad categories: — errors caused by malfunction of aircraft equipment; and — operational errors. (2) An operator that consistently experiences errors in either category should have approval for RVSM operations suspended or revoked. If a problem is identified that is related to one specific aircraft type, then RVSM approval may be suspended or revoked for that specific type within that operator's fleet. (3) Operators’ actions: The operator should make an effective, timely response to each height keeping error. The competent authority may consider suspending or revoking RVSM approval if the operator's responses to height keeping errors are not effective or timely. The competent authority should consider the operator's past performance record in determining the action to be taken. (4) Reinstatement of approval: The operator should satisfy the competent authority that the causes of height keeping errors are understood and have been eliminated and that the operator's RVSM programmes and procedures are effective. At its discretion and to restore confidence, the competent authority may require an independent height monitoring check of affected aircraft to be performed.