AMC1 ARO.RAMP.135(b) Follow-up actions on findings

• ED Decision 2019/007/R found in: Air Operations (965/2012) Part-ARO Part-ORO Part-CAT Part-SPA Part-NCC Part-NCO Part-SPO (Sep 2023)

AMC1 ARO.RAMP.135(b) Follow-up actions on findings ED Decision 2019/007/R CLASSES OF ACTIONS FOR CATEGORY 3 FINDINGS (a) Whenever restrictions on the aircraft flight operation (Class 3a action) have been imposed, the competent authority should conduct appropriate verification of adherence to such restrictions. (b) Whenever the operator is required to take corrective actions before departure (Class 3b action), inspectors should verify that the operator has taken such actions. Depending on the circumstances, this verification may take place after the departure. (c) Whenever a category 3 finding is raised, the aircraft should be grounded only (Class 3c action) if the crew refuses to take the necessary corrective actions or to respect imposed restrictions on the aircraft flight operation. However, grounding might be appropriate if an operator refuses to grant access in accordance with [ORO.GEN.140](#_DxCrossRefBm318085226) (in case of an EU operator) or contrary to Regulation (EU) 452/2014 (in case of a third country operator). The inspecting authority should then ensure that the aircraft will not depart as long as the reasons for the grounding remain. Any records of communication undertaken pursuant to [ARO.RAMP.140(b)](#_DxCrossRefBm318085356), as well as other evidences, should be collected and kept as evidential material. (d) If inspectors have imposed any restrictions and/or corrective actions, these should be mentioned in the ramp inspection report. AMC1 ARO.RAMP.135(b) Follow-up actions on findings ED Decision 2019/007/R CLASSES OF ACTIONS FOR CATEGORY 3 FINDINGS (a) Whenever restrictions on the aircraft flight operation (Class 3a action) have been imposed, the competent authority should conduct appropriate verification of adherence to such restrictions. (b) Whenever the operator is required to take corrective actions before departure (Class 3b action), inspectors should verify that the operator has taken such actions. Depending on the circumstances, this verification may take place after the departure. (c) Whenever a category 3 finding is raised, the aircraft should be grounded only (Class 3c action) if the crew refuses to take the necessary corrective actions or to respect imposed restrictions on the aircraft flight operation. However, grounding might be appropriate if an operator refuses to grant access in accordance with [ORO.GEN.140](#_DxCrossRefBm927677590) (in case of an EU operator) or contrary to Regulation (EU) 452/2014 (in case of a third country operator). The inspecting authority should then ensure that the aircraft will not depart as long as the reasons for the grounding remain. Any records of communication undertaken pursuant to [ARO.RAMP.140(b)](#_DxCrossRefBm927677725), as well as other evidences, should be collected and kept as evidential material. (d) If inspectors have imposed any restrictions and/or corrective actions, these should be mentioned in the ramp inspection report. ##### AMC1 ARO.RAMP.135(b) Follow-up actions on findings *ED Decision 2019/007/R* **CLASSES OF ACTIONS FOR CATEGORY 3 FINDINGS** (a) Whenever restrictions on the aircraft flight operation (Class 3a action) have been imposed, the competent authority should conduct appropriate verification of adherence to such restrictions. (b) Whenever the operator is required to take corrective actions before departure (Class 3b action), inspectors should verify that the operator has taken such actions. Depending on the circumstances, this verification may take place after the departure. (c) Whenever a category 3 finding is raised, the aircraft should be grounded only (Class 3c action) if the crew refuses to take the necessary corrective actions or to respect imposed restrictions on the aircraft flight operation. However, grounding might be appropriate if an operator refuses to grant access in accordance with [ORO.GEN.140](#_DxCrossRefBm523087099) (in case of an EU operator) or contrary to Regulation (EU) 452/2014 (in case of a third country operator). The inspecting authority should then ensure that the aircraft will not depart as long as the reasons for the grounding remain. Any records of communication undertaken pursuant to [ARO.RAMP.140(b)](#_DxCrossRefBm523087238), as well as other evidences, should be collected and kept as evidential material. (d) If inspectors have imposed any restrictions and/or corrective actions, these should be mentioned in the ramp inspection report.