AMC1 ARO.RAMP.100(c) General

• ED Decision 2019/007/R found in: Air Operations (965/2012) Part-ARO Part-ORO Part-CAT Part-SPA Part-NCC Part-NCO Part-SPO (Feb 2025)

AMC1 ARO.RAMP.100(c) General ED Decision 2019/007/R ANNUAL RAMP INSPECTION PROGRAMME (a) The competent authority should establish an annual ramp inspection programme and determine the number of inspections for the upcoming calendar year. (b) To establish the annual ramp inspection programme, the competent authority should consider layer 1 and layer 2 operators as defined in [AMC1 ARO.RAMP.150(b)(4)(iii)](#_DxCrossRefBm927677695). (c) For layer 1 operators, the annual ramp inspection programme should meet the target numbers of inspections as assigned by the Agency for the Member State territories in ICAO EUR region. The assigned targets for layer 1 operators may be exceeded in the following cases: (1) operators recently considered in the lists provided by the Agency as per [ARO.RAMP.105(a)](#_DxCrossRefBm927677691); or (2) safety reasons that were not identified in the annual programme. The competent authority should keep records of the reasons leading to such over-inspections on layer 1 operators. (d) For layer 2 operators, the total planned number of inspections as defined in the annual ramp inspection programme should not be less than the layer 2 operators target assigned by the Agency for the Member State territories in ICAO EUR region. (e) The annual ramp inspection programme should take seasonal traffic patterns into account and, as far as possible, evenly distribute the inspections over the year. (f) The competent authority should ensure that the annual ramp inspection programme leaves appropriate time and resources to enable the inspections of aircraft operated by layer 2 operators suspected of not being compliant with the applicable requirements. (g) The competent authority should ensure that layer 2 operators, including unforeseen ones which cannot be a part of the established annual programme, receive inspections proportionate to the traffic pattern in the State. The following priority criteria should be considered before deciding to inspect the aircraft: (1) prioritised ramp inspections as per [ARO.RAMP.105(a)](#_DxCrossRefBm927677691); (2) aircraft suspected of not being compliant with the applicable requirements; and (3) inspection of an operator which was not inspected in accordance with ARO.RAMP in any State in the previous 12 months; (h) The competent authority should amend the annual ramp inspection programme as necessary to the extent possible: (1) when new targets are assigned by the Agency; (2) when new layer 2 operators start operations; or (3) following the identification of a significant increase of the safety risks level as per [ARO.RAMP.100(c)(1)](#_DxCrossRefBm927677690). AMC1 ARO.RAMP.100(c) General ED Decision 2019/007/R ANNUAL RAMP INSPECTION PROGRAMME (a) The competent authority should establish an annual ramp inspection programme and determine the number of inspections for the upcoming calendar year. (b) To establish the annual ramp inspection programme, the competent authority should consider layer 1 and layer 2 operators as defined in [AMC1 ARO.RAMP.150(b)(4)(iii)](#_DxCrossRefBm318085326). (c) For layer 1 operators, the annual ramp inspection programme should meet the target numbers of inspections as assigned by the Agency for the Member State territories in ICAO EUR region. The assigned targets for layer 1 operators may be exceeded in the following cases: (1) operators recently considered in the lists provided by the Agency as per [ARO.RAMP.105(a)](#_DxCrossRefBm318085322); or (2) safety reasons that were not identified in the annual programme. The competent authority should keep records of the reasons leading to such over-inspections on layer 1 operators. (d) For layer 2 operators, the total planned number of inspections as defined in the annual ramp inspection programme should not be less than the layer 2 operators target assigned by the Agency for the Member State territories in ICAO EUR region. (e) The annual ramp inspection programme should take seasonal traffic patterns into account and, as far as possible, evenly distribute the inspections over the year. (f) The competent authority should ensure that the annual ramp inspection programme leaves appropriate time and resources to enable the inspections of aircraft operated by layer 2 operators suspected of not being compliant with the applicable requirements. (g) The competent authority should ensure that layer 2 operators, including unforeseen ones which cannot be a part of the established annual programme, receive inspections proportionate to the traffic pattern in the State. The following priority criteria should be considered before deciding to inspect the aircraft: (1) prioritised ramp inspections as per [ARO.RAMP.105(a)](#_DxCrossRefBm318085322); (2) aircraft suspected of not being compliant with the applicable requirements; and (3) inspection of an operator which was not inspected in accordance with ARO.RAMP in any State in the previous 12 months; (h) The competent authority should amend the annual ramp inspection programme as necessary to the extent possible: (1) when new targets are assigned by the Agency; (2) when new layer 2 operators start operations; or (3) following the identification of a significant increase of the safety risks level as per [ARO.RAMP.100(c)(1)](#_DxCrossRefBm318085321). ##### AMC1 ARO.RAMP.100(c) General *ED Decision 2019/007/R* **ANNUAL RAMP INSPECTION PROGRAMME** (a) The competent authority should establish an annual ramp inspection programme and determine the number of inspections for the upcoming calendar year. (b) To establish the annual ramp inspection programme, the competent authority should consider layer 1 and layer 2 operators as defined in [AMC1 ARO.RAMP.150(b)(4)(iii)](#_DxCrossRefBm523087208). (c) For layer 1 operators, the annual ramp inspection programme should meet the target numbers of inspections as assigned by the Agency for the Member State territories in ICAO EUR region. The assigned targets for layer 1 operators may be exceeded in the following cases: (1) operators recently considered in the lists provided by the Agency as per [ARO.RAMP.105(a)](#_DxCrossRefBm523087204); or (2) safety reasons that were not identified in the annual programme. The competent authority should keep records of the reasons leading to such over-inspections on layer 1 operators. (d) For layer 2 operators, the total planned number of inspections as defined in the annual ramp inspection programme should not be less than the layer 2 operators target assigned by the Agency for the Member State territories in ICAO EUR region. (e) The annual ramp inspection programme should take seasonal traffic patterns into account and, as far as possible, evenly distribute the inspections over the year. (f) The competent authority should ensure that the annual ramp inspection programme leaves appropriate time and resources to enable the inspections of aircraft operated by layer 2 operators suspected of not being compliant with the applicable requirements. (g) The competent authority should ensure that layer 2 operators, including unforeseen ones which cannot be a part of the established annual programme, receive inspections proportionate to the traffic pattern in the State. The following priority criteria should be considered before deciding to inspect the aircraft: (1) prioritised ramp inspections as per [ARO.RAMP.105(a)](#_DxCrossRefBm523087204); (2) aircraft suspected of not being compliant with the applicable requirements; and (3) inspection of an operator which was not inspected in accordance with ARO.RAMP in any State in the previous 12 months; (h) The competent authority should amend the annual ramp inspection programme as necessary to the extent possible: (1) when new targets are assigned by the Agency; (2) when new layer 2 operators start operations; or (3) following the identification of a significant increase of the safety risks level as per [ARO.RAMP.100(c)(1)](#_DxCrossRefBm523087203).