Light
Dark
System
Log In
Loading...
Compare / EASA/
Incorporated Amendments
/
Compare & Highlight Differences
AMC 27.783 Doors
Available versions for ERULES-1963177438-11502
ED Decision 2018/007/R
found in: CS-27 Amdt 9 - Small Rotorcraft (Dec 2021)
From
CS-27 Amdt 10 - Sm... (Feb 2023)
CS-27 Amdt 9 - Sma... (Dec 2021)
From section
To
CS-27 Amdt 10 - Sm... (Feb 2023)
CS-27 Amdt 9 - Sma... (Dec 2021)
To section
No visible text changes
0 removals
0 additions
View
Rich
Plain
Sync scrolling
Share
From
Show details
Hide details
To
Show details
Hide details
Version
Show side by side
AMC 27.783 Doors ED Decision 2018/007/R This AMC provides further guidance and acceptable means of compliance to supplement FAA AC 27-1B AC 27.783 § 27.783 to meet EASA’s interpretation of [CS 27.783](#_DxCrossRefBm472493373). As such it should be used in conjunction with the FAA AC but take precedence over it, where stipulated, in the showing of compliance. Specifically, this AMC addresses one area where the FAA AC has been deemed by EASA as being at variance to EASA’s interpretation. This area is as follows: (a) Explanation […] (4) Any means of egress (door, hatch, openable window) intended for use following ditching need not have a threshold above the waterline of the rotorcraft in calm water. However, the usability of the egress means should be substantiated in all sea conditions up to and including those chosen for showing compliance with [CS 27.801(e)](#_DxCrossRefBm472493312) or [27.802(c)](#_DxCrossRefBm472493311) as appropriate. See also [AMC 27.801](#_DxCrossRefBm472493376) paragraph (b)(10) and [AMC 27.802](#_DxCrossRefBm472493375) paragraph (b)(7). [Amdt No: 27/5]
AMC 27.783 Doors ED Decision 2018/007/R This AMC provides further guidance and acceptable means of compliance to supplement FAA AC 27-1B AC 27.783 § 27.783 to meet EASA’s interpretation of [CS 27.783](#_DxCrossRefBm8893946). As such it should be used in conjunction with the FAA AC but take precedence over it, where stipulated, in the showing of compliance. Specifically, this AMC addresses one area where the FAA AC has been deemed by EASA as being at variance to EASA’s interpretation. This area is as follows: (a) Explanation […] (4) Any means of egress (door, hatch, openable window) intended for use following ditching need not have a threshold above the waterline of the rotorcraft in calm water. However, the usability of the egress means should be substantiated in all sea conditions up to and including those chosen for showing compliance with [CS 27.801(e)](#_DxCrossRefBm8893881) or [27.802(c)](#_DxCrossRefBm8893880) as appropriate. See also [AMC 27.801](#_DxCrossRefBm8893949) paragraph (b)(10) and [AMC 27.802](#_DxCrossRefBm8893948) paragraph (b)(7). [Amdt No: 27/5]