Light
Dark
System
Log In
Loading...
Compare / EASA/
Incorporated Amendments
/
Compare & Highlight Differences
CS 29.801 Ditching
Available versions for ERULES-1963177438-11428
ED Decision 2018/007/R
found in: CS-29 Amdt 10 - Large Rotercraft (Jan 2023)
ED Decision 2023/001/R
found in: CS-29 Amdt 11 - Large Rotercraft (Feb 2023)
From
CS-29 Amdt 12 - La... (Mar 2026)
CS-29 Amdt 11 - La... (Feb 2023)
CS-29 Amdt 10 - La... (Jan 2023)
From section
To
CS-29 Amdt 12 - La... (Mar 2026)
CS-29 Amdt 11 - La... (Feb 2023)
CS-29 Amdt 10 - La... (Jan 2023)
To section
No visible text changes
0 removals
0 additions
View
Rich
Plain
Sync scrolling
Share
From
Show details
Hide details
To
Show details
Hide details
Version
Show side by side
CS 29.801 Ditching ED Decision 2018/007/R (a) If certification with ditching provisions is requested by the applicant, the rotorcraft must meet the requirements of this CS and [CS 29.563](#_DxCrossRefBm1513259452), [CS 29.783(h)](#_DxCrossRefBm1513259515), [CS 29.803(c)](#_DxCrossRefBm1513259529), [CS 29.805(c)](#_DxCrossRefBm1513259528), [CS 29.807(d)](#_DxCrossRefBm1513259527), [CS 29.809(j)](#_DxCrossRefBm1513259526), [CS 29.811(h)](#_DxCrossRefBm1513259525), [CS 29.813(d)](#_DxCrossRefBm1513259524), [CS 29.1411](#_DxCrossRefBm1513259523), [CS 29.1415](#_DxCrossRefBm1513259522), [CS 29.1470](#_DxCrossRefBm1513259521), [CS 29.1555(d)(3)](#_DxCrossRefBm1513259520) and [CS 29.1561](#_DxCrossRefBm1513259519). (b) Each practicable design measure, compatible with the general characteristics of the rotorcraft, must be taken to minimise the probability that when ditching, the behaviour of the rotorcraft would cause immediate injury to the occupants or would make it impossible for them to escape. (c) An emergency flotation system that is stowed in a deflated condition during normal flight must: (1) be designed such that the effects of a water impact (i.e. crash) on the emergency flotation system are minimised. (2) have a means of automatic deployment following water entry. Automatic deployment must not rely on any pilot action during flight. (d) The probable behaviour of the rotorcraft during ditching water entry must be must be shown to exhibit no unsafe characteristics. (e) The rotorcraft must be shown to resist capsize in the sea conditions selected by the applicant. The probability of capsizing in a 5-minute exposure to the sea conditions must be substantiated to be less than or equal to 3.0 % with a fully serviceable emergency flotation system and 30.0 % with the critical float compartment failed, with 95 % confidence. Allowances must be made for probable structural damage and leakage. (f) Unless the effects of the collapse of external doors and windows are accounted for in the investigation of the probable behaviour of the rotorcraft during ditching (as prescribed in sub-paragraphs (d) and (e)), the external doors and windows must be designed to withstand the probable maximum local pressures. (g) It must be shown that the rotorcraft will not sink following the functional loss of any single complete flotation unit. [Amdt No: 29/5]
CS 29.801 Ditching ED Decision 2023/001/R (a) If certification with ditching provisions is requested by the applicant, the rotorcraft must meet the requirements of this CS and [CS 29.563](#_DxCrossRefBm1178331845), [CS 29.783(h)](#_DxCrossRefBm1178331912), [CS 29.803(c)](#_DxCrossRefBm1178331927), [CS 29.805(c)](#_DxCrossRefBm1178331926), [CS 29.807(d)](#_DxCrossRefBm1178331925), [CS 29.809(j)](#_DxCrossRefBm1178331924), [CS 29.811(h)](#_DxCrossRefBm1178331923), [CS 29.813(d)](#_DxCrossRefBm1178331922), [CS 29.1411](#_DxCrossRefBm1178331921), [CS 29.1415](#_DxCrossRefBm1178331920), [CS 29.1470](#_DxCrossRefBm1178331919), [CS 29.1555(d)](#_DxCrossRefBm1178331918) and [CS 29.1561](#_DxCrossRefBm1178331917). (b) Each practicable design measure, compatible with the general characteristics of the rotorcraft, must be taken to minimise the probability that when ditching, the behaviour of the rotorcraft would cause immediate injury to the occupants or would make it impossible for them to escape. (c) An emergency flotation system that is stowed in a deflated condition during normal flight must: (1) be designed such that the effects of a water impact (i.e. crash) on the emergency flotation system are minimised. (2) have a means of automatic deployment following water entry. Automatic deployment must not rely on any pilot action during flight. (d) The probable behaviour of the rotorcraft during ditching water entry must be must be shown to exhibit no unsafe characteristics. (e) The rotorcraft must be shown to resist capsize in the sea conditions selected by the applicant. The probability of capsizing in a 5-minute exposure to the sea conditions must be substantiated to be less than or equal to 3.0 % with a fully serviceable emergency flotation system and 30.0 % with the critical float compartment failed, with 95 % confidence. Allowances must be made for probable structural damage and leakage. (f) Unless the effects of the collapse of external doors and windows are accounted for in the investigation of the probable behaviour of the rotorcraft during ditching (as prescribed in sub-paragraphs (d) and (e)), the external doors and windows must be designed to withstand the probable maximum local pressures. (g) It must be shown that the rotorcraft will not sink following the functional loss of any single complete flotation unit. [Amdt No: 29/5] [Amdt No: 29/11]
#### CS 29.801 Ditching *ED Decision 2023/001/R* (a) If certification with ditching provisions is requested by the applicant, the rotorcraft must meet the requirements of this CS and [CS 29.563](#_DxCrossRefBm1685772310), [CS 29.783(h)](#_DxCrossRefBm1685772377), [CS 29.803(c)](#_DxCrossRefBm1685772392), [CS 29.805(c)](#_DxCrossRefBm1685772391), [CS 29.807(d)](#_DxCrossRefBm1685772390), [CS 29.809(j)](#_DxCrossRefBm1685772389), [CS 29.811(h)](#_DxCrossRefBm1685772388), [CS 29.813(d)](#_DxCrossRefBm1685772387), [CS 29.1411](#_DxCrossRefBm1685772386), [CS 29.1415](#_DxCrossRefBm1685772385), [CS 29.1470](#_DxCrossRefBm1685772384), [CS 29.1555(d)](#_DxCrossRefBm1685772383) and [CS 29.1561](#_DxCrossRefBm1685772382). (b) Each practicable design measure, compatible with the general characteristics of the rotorcraft, must be taken to minimise the probability that when ditching, the behaviour of the rotorcraft would cause immediate injury to the occupants or would make it impossible for them to escape. (c) An emergency flotation system that is stowed in a deflated condition during normal flight must: (1) be designed such that the effects of a water impact (i.e. crash) on the emergency flotation system are minimised. (2) have a means of automatic deployment following water entry. Automatic deployment must not rely on any pilot action during flight. (d) The probable behaviour of the rotorcraft during ditching water entry must be must be shown to exhibit no unsafe characteristics. (e) The rotorcraft must be shown to resist capsize in the sea conditions selected by the applicant. The probability of capsizing in a 5-minute exposure to the sea conditions must be substantiated to be less than or equal to 3.0 % with a fully serviceable emergency flotation system and 30.0 % with the critical float compartment failed, with 95 % confidence. Allowances must be made for probable structural damage and leakage. (f) Unless the effects of the collapse of external doors and windows are accounted for in the investigation of the probable behaviour of the rotorcraft during ditching (as prescribed in sub-paragraphs (d) and (e)), the external doors and windows must be designed to withstand the probable maximum local pressures. (g) It must be shown that the rotorcraft will not sink following the functional loss of any single complete flotation unit. [Amdt No: 29/5] [Amdt No: 29/11]