GM3 ARA.GEN.200(a)(2) Management system

• ED Decision 2017/022/R found in: Aircrew (1178/2011) Part-FCL Part-MED Part-CC Part-ARA Part-ORA Part-DTO (Aug 2023)

GM3 ARA.GEN.200(a)(2) Management system ED Decision 2017/022/R The meaning of ‘relevant ratings and certificates appropriate to the level of the training conducted’, as used in [AMC2 ARA.GEN.200(a)(2)](#_DxCrossRefBm1199963904), is explained below: — the range of activities in an ATO may vary from instructions for the simple single-engined aircraft to type training for CS-25-certified multi-pilot aircraft; — in the context of the general approval of the ATO, experience in similar types or classes of aircraft is acceptable; — the inspector has the instructional experience in the same or similar types or the same class of aircraft intended to be flown within the ATO (e.g. a type rating to assess the type training programmes); and — the experience in CS-25-certified multi-pilot aircraft will not, for example, equip the inspector to assess the training programme in an ATO operating only single-engine piston (SEP) (land) aircraft; similarly, experience as a PPL instructor will not necessarily equip the inspector to assess a type training course for a CS-25 aircraft; in both cases, additional appropriate training in the applicable environment is necessary. GM3 ARA.GEN.200(a)(2) Management system ED Decision 2017/022/R The meaning of ‘relevant ratings and certificates appropriate to the level of the training conducted’, as used in [AMC2 ARA.GEN.200(a)(2)](#_DxCrossRefBm894736049), is explained below: — the range of activities in an ATO may vary from instructions for the simple single-engined aircraft to type training for CS-25-certified multi-pilot aircraft; — in the context of the general approval of the ATO, experience in similar types or classes of aircraft is acceptable; — the inspector has the instructional experience in the same or similar types or the same class of aircraft intended to be flown within the ATO (e.g. a type rating to assess the type training programmes); and — the experience in CS-25-certified multi-pilot aircraft will not, for example, equip the inspector to assess the training programme in an ATO operating only single-engine piston (SEP) (land) aircraft; similarly, experience as a PPL instructor will not necessarily equip the inspector to assess a type training course for a CS-25 aircraft; in both cases, additional appropriate training in the applicable environment is necessary. ##### GM3 ARA.GEN.200(a)(2) Management system *ED Decision 2017/022/R* The meaning of ‘relevant ratings and certificates appropriate to the level of the training conducted’, as used in [AMC2 ARA.GEN.200(a)(2)](#_DxCrossRefBm1743303715), is explained below: — the range of activities in an ATO may vary from instructions for the simple single-engined aircraft to type training for CS-25-certified multi-pilot aircraft; — in the context of the general approval of the ATO, experience in similar types or classes of aircraft is acceptable; — the inspector has the instructional experience in the same or similar types or the same class of aircraft intended to be flown within the ATO (e.g. a type rating to assess the type training programmes); and — the experience in CS-25-certified multi-pilot aircraft will not, for example, equip the inspector to assess the training programme in an ATO operating only single-engine piston (SEP) (land) aircraft; similarly, experience as a PPL instructor will not necessarily equip the inspector to assess a type training course for a CS-25 aircraft; in both cases, additional appropriate training in the applicable environment is necessary.