AMC2 ARA.FSTD.100(a)(1) Initial evaluation procedure

• ED Decision 2012/006/R found in: Aircrew (1178/2011) Part-FCL Part-MED Part-CC Part-ARA Part-ORA Part-DTO (Aug 2023)

AMC2 ARA.FSTD.100(a)(1) Initial evaluation procedure ED Decision 2012/006/R GENERAL (a) During initial and recurrent FSTD evaluations it should be necessary for the competent authority to conduct an appropriate sample of the objective and subjective tests described in Part-ORA and detailed in CS-FSTD(A) and CS-FSTD(H), as applicable. There may be occasions when all tests cannot be completed – for example during recurrent evaluations on a convertible FSTD – but arrangements should be made for all tests to be completed within a reasonable time. (b) Following an evaluation, it is possible that a number of defects are identified. Generally, these defects should be rectified and the competent authority notified of such action within 30 days. Serious defects, which affect flight crew training, testing and checking, could result in an immediate downgrading of the qualification level I. If any defect remains unattended without good reason for a period greater than 30 days, subsequent downgrading may occur or the FSTD qualification could be revoked. (c) For the evaluation of an FSTD the standard form as mentioned in [AMC5 ARA.FSTD.100(a)(1)](#_DxCrossRefBm1199963997) should be used. AMC2 ARA.FSTD.100(a)(1) Initial evaluation procedure ED Decision 2012/006/R GENERAL (a)     During initial and recurrent FSTD evaluations it should be necessary for the competent authority to conduct an appropriate sample of the objective and subjective tests described in Part-ORA and detailed in CS-FSTD(A) and CS-FSTD(H), as applicable. There may be occasions when all tests cannot be completed – for example during recurrent evaluations on a convertible FSTD – but arrangements should be made for all tests to be completed within a reasonable time. (b)     Following an evaluation, it is possible that a number of defects are identified. Generally, these defects should be rectified and the competent authority notified of such action within 30 days. Serious defects, which affect flight crew training, testing and checking, could result in an immediate downgrading of the qualification level I. If any defect remains unattended without good reason for a period greater than 30 days, subsequent downgrading may occur or the FSTD qualification could be revoked. (c)      For the evaluation of an FSTD the standard form as mentioned in [AMC5 ARA.FSTD.100(a)(1)](#_DxCrossRefBm894736142) should be used. ##### AMC2 ARA.FSTD.100(a)(1) Initial evaluation procedure *ED Decision 2012/006/R* **GENERAL** (a) During initial and recurrent FSTD evaluations it should be necessary for the competent authority to conduct an appropriate sample of the objective and subjective tests described in Part-ORA and detailed in CS-FSTD(A) and CS-FSTD(H), as applicable. There may be occasions when all tests cannot be completed – for example during recurrent evaluations on a convertible FSTD – but arrangements should be made for all tests to be completed within a reasonable time. (b) Following an evaluation, it is possible that a number of defects are identified. Generally, these defects should be rectified and the competent authority notified of such action within 30 days. Serious defects, which affect flight crew training, testing and checking, could result in an immediate downgrading of the qualification level I. If any defect remains unattended without good reason for a period greater than 30 days, subsequent downgrading may occur or the FSTD qualification could be revoked. (c) For the evaluation of an FSTD the standard form as mentioned in [AMC5 ARA.FSTD.100(a)(1)](#_DxCrossRefBm1743303811) should be used.