GM3 FCL.735.A Multi-crew cooperation (MCC) training course - aeroplanes

• ED Decision 2017/022/R found in: Aircrew (1178/2011) Part-FCL Part-MED Part-CC Part-ARA Part-ORA Part-DTO (Dec 2024)

GM3 FCL.735.A Multi-crew cooperation (MCC) training course – aeroplanes ED Decision 2017/022/R EXAMPLE OF AN ENHANCED MCC TRAINING TO AIRLINE PILOT STANDARDS (APS MCC) GRADING SYSTEM <table border="1" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" width="101%"> <thead> <tr> <td colspan="6" valign="top" width="100%"> <p><b>EXAMPLE OF AN APS MCC GRADING SYSTEM</b></p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td valign="top" width="14%"> <p><b>Competency</b></p> </td> <td valign="top" width="16%"> <p><b>Unsatisfactory</b></p> </td> <td valign="top" width="16%"> <p><b>Satisfactory</b></p> </td> <td valign="top" width="17%"> <p><b>Good</b></p> </td> <td valign="top" width="17%"> <p><b>Very Good</b></p> </td> <td valign="top" width="17%"> <p><b>Exemplary</b></p> </td> </tr> </thead> <tr> <td valign="top" width="14%"> <p>General description of each competency level.</p> </td> <td valign="top" width="16%"> <p>The pilot’s performance in this competency was unsatisfactory with a negative effect on safety.</p> <p>The pilot did not demonstrate the majority of the relevant performance indicators.</p> </td> <td valign="top" width="16%"> <p>The pilot’s performance in this competency was satisfactory with a slightly positive effect on safety.</p> <p>The pilot demonstrated most of the relevant performance indicators in this competency to at least a satisfactory standard.</p> </td> <td valign="top" width="17%"> <p>The pilot’s performance in this competency was effective with a significant contribution to safety.</p> <p>The pilot consistently demonstrated most of the relevant performance indicators in this competency to a good standard.</p> </td> <td valign="top" width="17%"> <p>The pilot’s performance in this competency was very effective, which significantly enhanced safety.</p> <p>The pilot regularly demonstrated all of the relevant performance indicators in this competency to a very good standard.</p> </td> <td valign="top" width="17%"> <p>The pilot’s performance in this competency was exemplary with an outstanding effect on safety.</p> <p>The pilot always demonstrated all of the relevant performance indicators in this competency to an exemplary standard.</p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td colspan="3" valign="top" width="47%"> <p>Notes</p> </td> <td colspan="3" valign="top" width="52%"> <p>—          Most: 75 % or greater.</p> <p>—          Relevant performance indicator: a performance indicator/observable behaviour that is expected to be demonstrated during the assessment.</p> </td> </tr> </table> GM3 FCL.735.A Multi-crew cooperation (MCC) training course – aeroplanes ED Decision 2017/022/R EXAMPLE OF AN ENHANCED MCC TRAINING TO AIRLINE PILOT STANDARDS (APS MCC) GRADING SYSTEM <table border="1" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" width="101%"><thead><tr><td colspan="6" valign="top" width="100%"><p><b>EXAMPLE OF AN APS MCC GRADING SYSTEM</b></p></td></tr><tr><td valign="top" width="14%"><p><b>Competency</b></p></td><td valign="top" width="16%"><p><b>Unsatisfactory</b></p></td><td valign="top" width="16%"><p><b>Satisfactory</b></p></td><td valign="top" width="17%"><p><b>Good</b></p></td><td valign="top" width="17%"><p><b>Very Good</b></p></td><td valign="top" width="17%"><p><b>Exemplary</b></p></td></tr></thead><tr><td valign="top" width="14%"><p>General description of each competency level.</p></td><td valign="top" width="16%"><p>The pilot’s performance in this competency was unsatisfactory with a negative effect on safety.</p><p>The pilot did not demonstrate the majority of the relevant performance indicators.</p></td><td valign="top" width="16%"><p>The pilot’s performance in this competency was satisfactory with a slightly positive effect on safety.</p><p>The pilot demonstrated most of the relevant performance indicators in this competency to at least a satisfactory standard.</p></td><td valign="top" width="17%"><p>The pilot’s performance in this competency was effective with a significant contribution to safety.</p><p>The pilot consistently demonstrated most of the relevant performance indicators in this competency to a good standard.</p></td><td valign="top" width="17%"><p>The pilot’s performance in this competency was very effective, which significantly enhanced safety.</p><p>The pilot regularly demonstrated all of the relevant performance indicators in this competency to a very good standard.</p></td><td valign="top" width="17%"><p>The pilot’s performance in this competency was exemplary with an outstanding effect on safety.</p><p>The pilot always demonstrated all of the relevant performance indicators in this competency to an exemplary standard.</p></td></tr><tr><td colspan="3" valign="top" width="47%"><p>Notes</p></td><td colspan="3" valign="top" width="52%"><p>— Most: 75 % or greater.</p><p>— Relevant performance indicator: a performance indicator/observable behaviour that is expected to be demonstrated during the assessment.</p></td></tr></table> ##### GM3 FCL.735.A Multi-crew cooperation (MCC) training course – aeroplanes *ED Decision 2017/022/R* **EXAMPLE OF AN ENHANCED MCC TRAINING TO AIRLINE PILOT STANDARDS (APS MCC) GRADING SYSTEM** <table bgcolor="#d9d9d9" cellpadding="7" cellspacing="0"> <col/> <col/> <col/> <col/> <col/> <col/> <thead> <tr> <td bgcolor="#808080" colspan="6" valign="top"><p align="center"> <b>EXAMPLE OF AN APS MCC GRADING SYSTEM</b></p> </td> </tr> <tr valign="top"> <td bgcolor="#808080"><p align="center"> <b>Competency</b></p> </td> <td bgcolor="#808080"><p align="left"> <b>Unsatisfactory</b></p> </td> <td bgcolor="#808080"><p align="left"> <b>Satisfactory</b></p> </td> <td bgcolor="#808080"><p align="left"> <b>Good</b></p> </td> <td bgcolor="#808080"><p align="left"> <b>Very Good</b></p> </td> <td bgcolor="#808080"><p align="left"> <b>Exemplary</b></p> </td> </tr> </thead> <tbody> <tr valign="top"> <td bgcolor="#d9d9d9"><p align="left"> General description of each competency level.</p> </td> <td bgcolor="#d9d9d9"><p align="left"> The pilot’s performance in this competency was unsatisfactory with a negative effect on safety.</p> <p align="left">The pilot did not demonstrate the majority of the relevant performance indicators.</p> </td> <td bgcolor="#d9d9d9"><p align="left"> The pilot’s performance in this competency was satisfactory with a slightly positive effect on safety.</p> <p align="left">The pilot demonstrated most of the relevant performance indicators in this competency to at least a satisfactory standard.</p> </td> <td bgcolor="#d9d9d9"><p align="left"> The pilot’s performance in this competency was effective with a significant contribution to safety.</p> <p align="left">The pilot consistently demonstrated most of the relevant performance indicators in this competency to a good standard.</p> </td> <td bgcolor="#d9d9d9"><p align="left"> The pilot’s performance in this competency was very effective, which significantly enhanced safety.</p> <p align="left">The pilot regularly demonstrated all of the relevant performance indicators in this competency to a very good standard.</p> </td> <td bgcolor="#d9d9d9"><p align="left"> The pilot’s performance in this competency was exemplary with an outstanding effect on safety.</p> <p align="left">The pilot always demonstrated all of the relevant performance indicators in this competency to an exemplary standard.</p> </td> </tr> <tr valign="top"> <td bgcolor="#d9d9d9" colspan="3"><p align="left"> Notes</p> <p align="left"><br/> </p> </td> <td bgcolor="#d9d9d9" colspan="3"><p align="left"> — Most: 75 % or greater.</p> <p align="left">— Relevant performance indicator: a performance indicator/observable behaviour that is expected to be demonstrated during the assessment.</p> </td> </tr> </tbody> </table>