Light
Dark
System
Log In
Loading...
Compare / EASA/
Incorporated Amendments
/
Compare & Highlight Differences
GM1 SERA.11005 Unlawful interference
Available versions for ERULES-1963177438-10383
ED Decision 2016/023/R
found in: SERA (923/2012) Standardised European Rules of the Air (Feb 2023)
From
SERA - Standardise... (Aug 2025)
SERA (923/2012) St... (Dec 2024)
SERA (923/2012) St... (Feb 2023)
From section
To
SERA - Standardise... (Aug 2025)
SERA (923/2012) St... (Dec 2024)
SERA (923/2012) St... (Feb 2023)
To section
No visible text changes
0 removals
0 additions
View
Rich
Plain
Sync scrolling
Share
From
Show details
Hide details
To
Show details
Hide details
Version
Show side by side
GM1 SERA.11005 Unlawful interference ED Decision 2016/023/R The following procedures are intended as guidance for use by aircraft when unlawful interference occurs and the aircraft is unable to notify an ATS unit of this fact. (a) If the pilot-in-command cannot proceed to an aerodrome, they should attempt to continue flying on the assigned track and at the assigned cruising level at least until able to notify an ATS unit or until within radar or ADS-B coverage. (b) When an aircraft subjected to an act of unlawful interference must depart from its assigned track or its assigned cruising level without being able to make radiotelephony contact with ATS, the pilot-in-command should, whenever possible: (1) attempt to broadcast warnings on the VHF channel in use or the VHF emergency frequency, and other appropriate channels, unless considerations aboard the aircraft dictate otherwise. Other equipment such as on-board transponders and data links should also be used when it is advantageous to do so and circumstances permit; and (2) proceed in accordance with applicable special procedures for in-flight contingencies, where such procedures have been established and promulgated in the Regional Supplementary Procedures (Doc 7030); or (3) if no applicable regional procedures have been established, proceed at a level which differs from the cruising levels normally used for an IFR flight by: (i) 150 m (500 ft) in an area where a vertical separation minimum of 300 m (1 000 ft) is applied; or (ii) 300 m (1 000 ft) in an area where a vertical separation minimum of 600 m (2 000 ft) is applied.
GM1 SERA.11005 Unlawful interference ED Decision 2016/023/R The following procedures are intended as guidance for use by aircraft when unlawful interference occurs and the aircraft is unable to notify an ATS unit of this fact. (a) If the pilot-in-command cannot proceed to an aerodrome, they should attempt to continue flying on the assigned track and at the assigned cruising level at least until able to notify an ATS unit or until within radar or ADS-B coverage. (b) When an aircraft subjected to an act of unlawful interference must depart from its assigned track or its assigned cruising level without being able to make radiotelephony contact with ATS, the pilot-in-command should, whenever possible: (1) attempt to broadcast warnings on the VHF channel in use or the VHF emergency frequency, and other appropriate channels, unless considerations aboard the aircraft dictate otherwise. Other equipment such as on-board transponders and data links should also be used when it is advantageous to do so and circumstances permit; and (2) proceed in accordance with applicable special procedures for in-flight contingencies, where such procedures have been established and promulgated in the Regional Supplementary Procedures (Doc 7030); or (3) if no applicable regional procedures have been established, proceed at a level which differs from the cruising levels normally used for an IFR flight by: (i) 150 m (500 ft) in an area where a vertical separation minimum of 300 m (1 000 ft) is applied; or (ii) 300 m (1 000 ft) in an area where a vertical separation minimum of 600 m (2 000 ft) is applied.
##### GM1 SERA.11005 Unlawful interference *ED Decision 2016/023/R* The following procedures are intended as guidance for use by aircraft when unlawful interference occurs and the aircraft is unable to notify an ATS unit of this fact. (a) If the pilot-in-command cannot proceed to an aerodrome, they should attempt to continue flying on the assigned track and at the assigned cruising level at least until able to notify an ATS unit or until within radar or ADS-B coverage. (b) When an aircraft subjected to an act of unlawful interference must depart from its assigned track or its assigned cruising level without being able to make radiotelephony contact with ATS, the pilot-in-command should, whenever possible: (1) attempt to broadcast warnings on the VHF channel in use or the VHF emergency frequency, and other appropriate channels, unless considerations aboard the aircraft dictate otherwise. Other equipment such as on-board transponders and data links should also be used when it is advantageous to do so and circumstances permit; and (2) proceed in accordance with applicable special procedures for in-flight contingencies, where such procedures have been established and promulgated in the Regional Supplementary Procedures (Doc 7030); or (3) if no applicable regional procedures have been established, proceed at a level which differs from the cruising levels normally used for an IFR flight by: (i) 150 m (500 ft) in an area where a vertical separation minimum of 300 m (1 000 ft) is applied; or (ii) 300 m (1 000 ft) in an area where a vertical separation minimum of 600 m (2 000 ft) is applied.