MOC VTOL.2510(a) Aircraft
Parachute Rescue System
n/a
1. Scope of this MOC
(a) This MOC provides guidance and methods for addressing the installation and operation of Aircraft Parachute Rescue Systems (APRS). An APRS is intended to prevent serious injuries to the occupants and third parties, during an impact onto the ground while the aircraft is suspended beneath a fully inflated parachute system, following a serious in-flight incident.
(b) The MOC is applicable to VTOL capable aircraft in the Categories Basic and Enhanced.
(c) The purpose of this MOC is to offer a path for demonstrating compliance with SC-VTOL of an APRS installation intended as a last resort following a failure classified as catastrophic and already meeting the corresponding probability target as per MOC VTOL.2510, without taking any credit for the APRS. Therefore, APRS installations cannot be:
(1) used for substantiation or relief of requirements defined in SC-VTOL,
(2) part of the minimum equipment,
(3) compensation for any deviation from SC-VTOL.
2. Background
Aircraft Parachute Rescue Systems (APRS) are designed to provide a last safety resort in case of a partial or full loss of aircraft controllability. A variety of system concepts are available, a number of them have been tested successfully, and some have eventually been certified together with the aircraft design.
Common to all of them are parachute canopies made from textile fabric, lines, connecting bridles and a deployment system. Textile decelerators, parachutes are a sub-group of them, have a longstanding and successful history. The current technology covers the range of any combination from very low speed to high Mach numbers, light payload to tons of heavy payload and from low to high altitude [1].
Nevertheless, the engineer’s task remains challenging as the design needs to be tailored to the specific use. Furthermore, the interaction between the forebody wake and parachute system in all phases from deployment to landing depends highly on the design of the aircraft. Last, but not least, parachutes are made from fabric, the behaviour of which changes each time the same sample is tested.
Thusly, a certain margin in performance and reliability needs to be taken into account.
Furthermore, an efficient APRS requires two further elements, the suspension system and the crashworthiness of the aircraft fuselage. The suspension system connects the aircraft structure to the bridle line. It should assure a predefined attitude for touchdown, despite reasonably expectable damages to the aircraft structure. The crashworthiness of the aircraft fuselage is intended to dissipate and consume the impact energy such that the occupants suffer no serious injuries. It is obvious, that the effectivity of the crashworthiness depends on the correct attitude at initial touchdown with the ground.
Last, but not least, the demonstration of the function under realistic conditions is required. The APRS can be demonstrated for a certain Capability Category. The four available categories ⋆, ⋆⋆, ⋆⋆⋆, ⋆⋆⋆⋆ depend on the scope of the demonstrated scenarios and to what extent this has been shown by flight or ground test (see Chapter 5., Table 2).
This MOC VTOL.2510(a) is based on research data, existing standards (see Chapter 3.) and certification of parachute systems (see Chapter 4., Table 1) for General Aviation aircraft. It is applicable for SC-VTOL up to the maximum certified take-off mass of 5 700 kg or less.
3. Reference documents
[1] Parachute Recovery Systems Design Manual; T.W. Knacke, January 1992, ISBN: 0-915516-85-3
[2] ASTM F3408/F3408M-20, © ASTM International, 100 Barr Harbor Drive, PO Box C700, West Conshohocken, PA 19428-2959, U.S.A.
[3] Vorläufige Ergänzungsforderungen für den Einbau von Gesamtrettungssystemen in Segelflugzeugen und Motorseglern; Luftfahrt-Bundesamt, October1994
[4] OSTIV Airworthiness Standards for Sailplane Parachute Rescue Systems, October 1996, P. Kousal for OSTIV
[5] Entwicklung
von Nachweisverfahren für die Verkehrssicherheit von Segelflugzeugen und
Motorseglern;
W. Röger et al., February 2002, FE-Nr. L-1/98-50169/98, FH Aachen for German
Ministry of Transport
[6] Untersuchungen
des Insassenschutzes bei Unfällen mit Segelflugzeugen und Motorseglern;
M. Sperber et al., 1998, L-2/93-50112/92, TÜV Rheinland for German Ministry of
Transport
[7] Verbesserung der Insassensicherheit bei Segelflugzeugen und Motorseglern durch integrierte Rettungssysteme; W. Röger et al., April 1994, FE-Nr. L-2/90-50091/90, FH Aachen for German Ministry of Transport
[8] Insassensicherheit bei Luftfahrtgerät; W. Röger et al., December 1996, FE -L-4/94-50129/94, FH Aachen for German Ministry of Transport
4. EASA/FAA Publications
These MOCs have been issued as part of certification projects (in chronological order):
Table 1: EASA/FAA Publications
|
Number, Date, Authority |
Title |
Code, Aircraft |
Seats, MTOM, |
|
23–ACE–88 November 1997 FAA[4] |
Ballistic Recovery Systems Cirrus SR–20 Installation |
Part 23 Model SR-20 |
4 seats, 1 428 kg Vc 155 KTAS, 17 500 ft |
|
CSTMG01 SC 02 May 2008 EASA[5] |
CSTMG01 Special Condition 02 in accordance to Part 21.A.16B (a) (1): Sailplane Parachute Rescue System |
CS-22 generic (not model specific) |
2 seats, 900 kg Vc 270 km/h EAS |
|
SC-OVLA.div-01 March 2010 EASA2 |
Installation of Ballistic Recovery System (BRS) |
CS-VLA generic (not model specific) |
2 seats, 750 kg |
|
23-16-01-SC August 2016 FAA1 |
Cirrus Design Corporation, Model SF50; Whole Airplane Parachute Recovery System |
Part 23 Model SF50 |
5/7 seats, 6 000 lb Vc 250 kt, 28 000 ft |
5. Means of Compliance
For the demonstration of compliance with the Special Condition VTOL, the following Means of Compliance are accepted:
(a) ASTM standard ‘F3408/F3408M − 20, Standard Specification for Aircraft Emergency Parachute Recovery Systems’, reference [2], together with the additional requirements in (b),
(b) Supplemental requirements based on references [3] and [4], substantiated by references [5] through [8]. These are listed in Table 2 and Table 3 below:
|
Basic only |
Basic and Enhanced |
||||
|
Nr. |
Test requirement fulfilled |
⋆ |
⋆⋆ |
⋆⋆⋆ |
⋆⋆⋆⋆ |
|
i. |
Flight test deployment at vNE |
|
|
|
X |
|
ii. |
Flight test deployment in a stabilised turn at the most critical of the following combinations of bank angle and speed: - the maximum permissible bank angle at its maximum permissible speed - vH or vNE, whichever is lower, and its associated maximum bank angle |
|
|
X |
X |
|
iii. |
Flight test deployment during stabilised hover |
|
|
X (see Note 1) |
X (see Note 1) |
|
iv. |
Flight test deployment at maximum permissible vertical rate of descent (at zero forward speed) |
|
X |
X |
X |
|
v. |
Parachute drop test at maximum design altitude |
|
X |
X |
X |
|
vi. |
Parachute drop test at vNE |
X |
X |
X |
|
|
vii. |
Ground test deployment at lowest temperature |
|
|
X |
X |
|
viii. |
Ground test deployment at highest temperature |
|
X |
X |
X |
|
ix. |
Ground deployment/extraction test (zero height and speed), with increased mass of the rescue system according to maximum limit load factor n |
X |
X |
|
|
|
x. |
Static strength test of parachute attachment to the airframe up to ultimate load, considering flight speed up to vD. |
X |
X |
X |
X |
Color legend: Colour coding in Table 2 means, blue for an additional requirement, and orange for a no-longer applicable requirement when moving to the next higher Capability Category.
Note 1: Unless test requirement (iii) is shown to be less severe than (iv), both tests (iii) and (iv) should be performed for Capability Category *** and Capability Category ****.
|
Table 3: Supplemental requirements based on references [3] and [4] |
|
Compliance with requirements in ‘non-activated‘ condition |
|
The airworthiness requirements for the basic type design should be complied with to the full extent, as long as the aircraft rescue system is not activated. |
|
Opening shock |
|
Oscillation caused by the opening force should be sufficiently damped. |
|
At critical aircraft masses the parachute system should comply correspondingly with the applicable requirements of ETSO-C23f, or any equivalent acknowledged requirement. |
|
Application of opening shock into the aircraft structure |
|
All textile components of a suspension system should have at least a safety factor of 2 against failure. A possibly asymmetric loading of the suspension system should be taken into account. Precautions should be taken to prevent possible damages of the APRS due to aircraft structure damages such as sharp edges or splintering. |
|
Activation of the rescue system |
|
The design should provide sufficient margin to prevent malfunction caused by stacking up of tolerances (due to manufacturing and installation processes), temperature effect, g-load or any other conditions encountered in the operational domain. |
|
a) Manual operation of the rescue system should comply with VTOL.2510(a) and in addition should satisfy the following conditions: |
|
1) The release should be done by a handle which is pulled for activation. |
|
2) The handle should be (also under the expected acceleration conditions) well reachable and operable by pilots of differing size, by either right or left hand. |
|
3) The handle should be conspicuously colour coded and clearly marked from the other operating knobs of the aircraft. |
|
4) The handle should be large enough so that the necessary operating forces can be safely applied by the whole hand, even when gloves are worn. |
|
Example: A handle which |
|
- is located in a central position between the inceptor(s) (such as control stick or wheel) and the pilot, |
|
- has a colour coding by yellow-black rings, |
|
- is like a stiff loop handle (analogue to an ejection seat), |
|
is considered compliant with the above-mentioned requirements. |
|
b) Automatic operation of the rescue system should comply with VTOL.2510(a). |
|
c) For the activation, a combination of points a) and b) is acceptable. Nevertheless, each paragraph needs to be fully complied with. |
|
d) For points a) and b) the Flight Manual should describe in detail the required sequence of activation, the criteria for activation, the procedures to reconfigure the propulsion system in a secure manner and any related limitations and procedures, as applicable. |
|
A safety assessment should be performed to assess the effect of system normal function and functional failures. It should not only address potential hazards to the occupants and people on the ground during normal activation, but also following unintended/spurious activations. All failure conditions and their severity should be identified in line with VTOL.2510. On most aircraft, unintended/spurious activation is likely to have catastrophic effects in some phases of operation. Suitable precautions taken to ensure the system meets the safety objectives associated to these failure conditions should include all realistic conditions which occur during the |
|
- operation |
|
- rescue by first-aiders |
|
- storage |
|
- maintenance |
|
- transportation |
|
of the aircraft. |
|
b) The status ‘secured’/’armed’ should be simply and unequivocally verifiable from the inside and outside of the cockpit. |
|
Control forces and travel for the activation of the release mechanism |
|
a) The operating force necessary for the release of the system should be: - higher or equal to 10 daN, and, - lesser or equal to 20 daN. |
|
Mechanical integration of the rescue system into the aircraft |
|
The integration of all components required for the successful functioning of the rescue system should be done in an area of the aircraft, the damaging of which is improbable in case of mid-air collisions and aerial disintegration. |
|
Precautions against twisting of the parachute system |
|
Suitable means should ensure that no twisting of the parachute lines occurs due to rotation. |
|
Emissions |
|
Emissions produced by the use of the rescue system should neither lead to severe health impairment of the occupants, nor to break-out of a fire. |
|
Compliance with other requirements |
|
Compliance with these requirements should not relieve from compliance of other related requirements. For instance, regulations for handling explosives must be observed. |
|
Operating limitations and information |
|
Operating information should be furnished which define the handling of the system during |
|
- operation, |
|
- rescue by first-aiders, |
|
- storage, |
|
- maintenance, |
|
- transportation. |
Loading collections...