Under what circumstance would an EASA Form 1 need to be kept for a component under condition monitoring?

An EASA Form 1 would need to be kept for a component under condition monitoring if it is the means to fulfil another requirement quoted in M.A.305, such as demonstration of airworthiness directive (AD) compliance.

For components that are not subject to any of the primary maintenance processes described in GM M.A.305(d)(2), is an EASA Form 1 or equivalent required to be kept?

No, for components that are not subject to any of the primary maintenance processes described in GM M.A.305(d)(2) (i.e. Hard Time, On-Condition, Condition Monitoring), the EASA Form 1 or equivalent is not required to be kept.

Which primary maintenance processes are listed in GM M.A.305(d)(2) that, if a component is not subject to any of them, the EASA Form 1 need not be kept?

The primary maintenance processes listed in GM M.A.305(d)(2) are Hard Time, On-Condition, and Condition Monitoring. If a component is not subject to any of these, the EASA Form 1 or equivalent is not required to be kept.

Does the requirement to keep an EASA Form 1 for condition monitoring components apply if the form is used to demonstrate compliance with an airworthiness directive?

Yes, the requirement to keep an EASA Form 1 for condition monitoring components applies if the form is the means to fulfil another requirement quoted in M.A.305, such as demonstration of AD compliance.

GM M.A.305(e)(3) Aircraft continuing airworthiness record system

Q: When is an EASA Form 1 or equivalent not required to be kept for the 'condition monitoring' process of components?

An EASA Form 1 or equivalent is not required to be kept for the 'condition monitoring' process of components unless this is the means to fulfil another requirement quoted in M.A.305 (e.g. demonstration of AD compliance).

Navigate / EASA

Ask question Discover more Add to collection

GM M.A.305(e)(3) Aircraft continuing airworthiness record system

ED Decision 2020/002/R

(a) EASA Form 1 or equivalent is not required to be kept for the ‘condition monitoring’ process of components unless this is the means to fulfil another requirement quoted in M.A.305 (e.g. demonstration of AD compliance).

(b) For components that are not subject to any of the primary maintenance processes described in the GM M.A.305(d)(2) (i.e. Hard Time, On-Condition, Condition Monitoring), the EASA Form 1 or equivalent is not required to be kept.

Details

Source-Title: GM M.A.305(e)(3) Aircraft continuing airworthiness record system View latest amendments

Erulesid: ERULES-1963177438-16477 Compare versions

Domain: Continuing airworthiness

Amendedby: Amendment 3

Applicabilitydate: 24 March 2020

Entryintoforcedate: 14 March 2020

Regulatorysource: ED Decision 2020/002/R Navigate

Regulatorysubject: Part-M

Typeofcontent: GM to IR (Guidance material to implementing rule)

Parentir: M.A.305 Aircraft continuing airworthiness record system

Origin: EASA

Category: EAR