ED Decision 2020/002/R
(a) The competent authority should have adequate control over any changes to the personnel specified in points CAMO.A.305(a), (b)(2), (e) and (f). Such changes in personnel will require an amendment to the exposition.
(b) When an organisation submits the name of a new nominee for any of the personnel specified in points CAMO.A.305(a), (b)(2) and (e), the competent authority may require the organisation to produce a written résumé of the proposed person's qualifications. The competent authority should reserve the right to interview the nominee or call for additional evidence of his or her suitability before deciding upon him or her being acceptable.
(c) For changes requiring prior approval, in order to verify the organisation's compliance with the applicable requirements, the competent authority should conduct an audit of the organisation, limited to the extent of the changes, and determine whether a risk assessment needs to be provided by the organisation.
(d) If a risk assessment is deemed to be necessary, the competent authority should inform the organisation accordingly.
(e) If the competent authority considers that it is necessary to review the risk assessment performed by the organisation, it should request the organisation to provide it, and assess its result.
(f) If required, the audit may include interviews and inspections carried out at the organisation’s facilities.
(g) The applicable part(s) of EASA Form 13-CAMO should be used to document the assessment of any changes to the Part-CAMO approval.
Guidance for competent authorities on controlling CAMO personnel changes, including audits, risk assessments, nominee résumés, and using EASA Form 13-CAMO for documentation.
* Summary by Aviation.Bot - Always consult the original document for the most accurate information.
Loading collections...