What specific changes in an organisation should trigger an annual review of the oversight programme to ensure it remains adequate?

The annual review should ensure the oversight programme remains adequate regarding any changes in the nature, complexity or the safety performance of the organisation.

Which two regulatory points are referenced as sources of relevant information for the annual review of the oversight programme?

The competent authority should consider relevant information collected in accordance with points CAMO.A.160 and CAMO.B.300(f).

AMC1 CAMO.B.305(a)

Q: What factors should the competent authority consider when reviewing the oversight planning cycle and oversight programme?

The competent authority should consider any relevant information collected in accordance with points CAMO.A.160 and CAMO.B.300(f) when reviewing the oversight planning cycle and the related oversight programme.

Navigate / EASA

Ask question Discover more Add to collection

AMC1 CAMO.B.305(a);(b) Oversight programme

ED Decision 2020/002/R

ANNUAL REVIEW

(a) The oversight planning cycle and the related oversight programme for each organisation should be reviewed annually to ensure that they remain adequate regarding any changes in the nature, complexity or the safety performance of the organisation.

(b) When reviewing the oversight planning cycle and the related oversight programme, the competent authority should also consider any relevant information collected in accordance with points CAMO.A.160 and CAMO.B.300(f).

Details

Source-Title: AMC1 CAMO.B.305(a), (b) Oversight programme View latest amendments

Erulesid: ERULES-1963177438-16380 Compare versions

Domain: Continuing airworthiness

Applicabilitydate: 24 March, 2020

Entryintoforcedate: 14 March, 2020

Regulatorysource: ED Decision 2020/002/R Navigate

Regulatorysubject: Part-CAMO

Typeofcontent: AMC to IR (Acceptable means of compliance to implementing rule)

Parentir: CAMO.B.305 Oversight programme

Origin: EASA

Category: EAR