AMC1 ARA.FSTD.100(a)(1) Initial evaluation procedure
ED Decision 2012/006/R
ASSESSMENT
PROCESS LEADING TO THE ISSUE OF AN FSTD QUALIFICATION
(a) FSTDs require evaluation leading to
qualification. The required process should be accomplished in two distinct
steps. First, a check should be made to determine whether or not the FSTD
complies with the applicable requirements. When making this check, the
competent authority should ensure that accountability for the issue of an FSTD
qualification is clearly defined. In all cases an individual department
manager of the competent authority should be appointed under whose personal
responsibility the issue of an FSTD qualification is to be considered. The
second step should be the grant (or refusal) of an FSTD qualification.
(b) When checking compliance with the
applicable requirements, the competent authority should ensure that the
following steps are taken:
(1) Once an FSTD is contracted to be built,
the organisation that is to operate the FSTD should ensure that the regulatory
standard upon which the FSTD will eventually be qualified against is
acceptable to the competent authority. This should be the current applicable
version of CS-FSTD(A) or CS-FSTD(H) at the time of application.
(2) A written application for an FSTD
qualification should be submitted, in a format according to ORA.FSTD.200, at
least 3 months before the date of intended operation. However, the
qualification test guide (QTG) may be submitted later, but not less than 30 days
before the date of intended evaluation. The application form should be printed
in English and any other language(s) of the competent authority's choosing.
(3) An individual should be nominated by the
department manager of the competent authority to oversee, and become the focal
point for, all aspects of the FSTD qualification process, and to coordinate
all necessary activity. The nominated person should be responsible to the
department manager for confirming that all appropriate evaluations/inspections
are made.
(4) The ability of the applicant to secure, in
compliance with the applicable requirements and certification specifications,
the safe and reliable operation and proper maintenance of the FSTD should be
assessed.
(5) The applicant's proposed compliance
monitoring system should be scrutinised with particular regard to the
allocated resources. Care should be taken to verify that the system is
comprehensive and likely to be effective.
(6) The competent authority should inform the
applicant of its final decision concerning the qualification within 14 days of
completion of the evaluation process irrespective of any temporary
qualification issued.
(7) On completion of the evaluation process,
the application, together with a written recommendation and evidence of the
result of all evaluations or assessments, should be presented to the nominated
person responsible for FSTD qualification. The presentation should be made by
the person with overall responsibility, nominated in accordance with (b)(3).
(8) The department manager of the competent
authority should only issue an FSTD qualification certificate if he/she is
completely satisfied that all requirements have been met. If he/she is not
satisfied, the applicant should be informed in writing of the improvements
that are required in order to satisfy the competent authority.
(9) If an application for an FSTD
qualification is refused, the applicant should be informed of such rights of
appeal as exist under national regulations.
To qualify a flight simulator (FSTD), authorities must evaluate its compliance. This involves two steps: compliance verification and qualification grant/refusal. The operator must ensure regulatory standard acceptance. A formal application is required months before operation. A nominated authority oversees the process, assessing safe operation, maintenance, and compliance monitoring. Final decisions are communicated promptly.
* Summary by Aviation.Bot - Always consult the original document for the most accurate information.
Loading collections...