GM1
ATM/ANS.OR.A.045(a) Changes
to a functional system
ED Decision 2020/008/R
(a) A change should be notified as soon
as the data defined in AMC1 ATM/ANS.OR.A.045(a) is available. The decision to review a change
by the competent authority will be based, in most circumstances, on the
notification data. Exceptions to this are cases where the competent authority
is not familiar with the type of change or the complexity of the change requires
a more thorough consideration.
(b) Early and accurate notification
facilitates the interactions between the provider and the competent authority and, thus, maximises the likelihood
of introducing a change into service in due time and according to the service
provider’s initial schedule when the competent authority has decided to review an assurance case. Therefore, it is advisable that
the change description identified in AMC1 ATM/ANS.OR.A.045(a) is completed as soon as possible
and contains the following data:
(1) Purpose of the change;
(2) Reasons for the change;
(3) Place of implementation;
(4) New/modified functions/services brought about by the change;
(5) High-level identification of the constituents of the functional system being changed, and what is modified in their functionality;
(6) Consequence of the change, i.e. the harmful
effects of the hazards associated with the change — see (f) below and also the
definition of ‘risk’ in Annex I (85).
(c) The information provided in (b) may
expedite the decision whether to review or not the proposed change, because it
will allow the competent
authority to gain
complete knowledge of the change and, consequently, reduces the need for
additional information. However, lack of some of this data should not delay
the service provider’s submission of the notification if to do so is likely to
impede the introduction of the change. It should be noted that early
interaction with its competent
authority may help to
complete the missing data.
(d) The service provider should take
into account that an early, clear and accurate change notification will assist
the competent
authority in making
the decision to review or not the change and may prevent any inconvenience
such as:
(1) the competent authority having to ask for more information
about the change in order to make its decision as required in ATM/ANS.OR.A.045(a)(2);
(2) the competent authority deciding to review a change
unnecessarily because the notification is not clear enough; or
(3) the delay in the competent authority deciding whether to review a
change, caused by the lack of information, having an impact on the proposed
date of entry into service.
(e) It is recognised that the
understanding of the change will improve as the change process progresses and
the interaction between the competent authority and the service provider strengthens. The service provider should notify
the competent authority when the information provided in the previous
notification is no longer valid or when the information previously missing
becomes available. When
additional information — other than the data specified in AMC1 ATM/ANS.OR.A.045(a)
— is supplied at the competent authority’s request, then no update of the
notification is required.
(f) For air traffic services (ATS)
providers, the consequences of the change specified in (b)(6), should be
expressed in terms of the harmful effects of the change, i.e. the effects of
the hazards associated with safety risks. These could be the result of a preliminary
safety assessment, if available, or an early hazard analysis that concentrates
on the service level effects. For service providers other than air traffic
services providers, the consequences should be expressed in terms of what
aspects of the performance of the service are impacted by the change.
(g) The point of contact, as required
in point (j) in AMC1 ATM/ANS.OR.A.045(a), provides a focal point for the competent authority to contact when seeking
complementary information about the change when required. The aim is to
improve communications between the provider and the competent authority about the change.
(h) All notified changes should be
unambiguously identified. The service provider and its competent authority should agree on a means of
referencing so as to associate a unique identifier to a given notified change.
(i) For routine changes, the
notification to the competent authority may be done in a simpler manner, e.g.
using forms less detailed than those specified in AMC1 ATM/ANS.OR.A.045(a) or notifying
these changes collectively after being implemented at regular periods of times
agreed between the provider and the competent authority. A service provider
and its competent authority should coordinate so as to reach a common
agreement on these types of changes that may not be reviewed by the competent
authority. The list of such changes should be documented and formalised. The
formalised agreement becomes part of the change management procedures
identified in ATM/ANS.OR.B.010.
Consequently, the list will be reviewed by the competent authority as part of
the audits it performs that are described in ATM/ANS.AR.C.010(a).
The relevant audit activity is detailed in AMC1 ATM/ANS.AR.C.010(a)(a)(2).
Aviation service providers must promptly notify competent authorities of functional system changes, including purpose, reasons, and consequences. Early, accurate notification facilitates timely review and implementation. Routine changes may follow simplified procedures agreed upon with the authority. Clear communication and unique change identification are crucial.
* Summary by Aviation.Bot - Always consult the original document for the most accurate information.
Loading collections...