AMC4 ATCO.B.040 Assessment of language proficiency
ED Decision 2023/011/R
CRITERIA FOR THE ACCEPTABILITY OF LANGUAGE ASSESSMENT BODIES
(a) A language assessment body should provide clear information about its organisation and its relationships with other organisations.
(b) If a language assessment body is also an air traffic controller training organisation, there should be a clear and documented separation between the two activities.
(c) The language assessment body should employ a sufficient number of qualified interlocutors and language proficiency assessors to administer the required tests.
(d) The assessment documentation should include at least the following:
(1) assessment objectives;
(2) assessment layout, timescale, technologies used, assessment samples, voice samples;
(3) assessment criteria and standards (at least for the operational, extended and expert levels of the rating scale in Appendix 1 to Annex I to Regulation (EU) 2015/340);
(4) documentation demonstrating the assessment validity, relevance and reliability for the operational and extended levels;
(5) documentation demonstrating the assessment validity, relevance and reliability for the expert level;
(6) procedures to ensure that language assessments are standardised within the language assessment body and in the ATC community;
(7) assessment procedures and responsibilities, such as:
— preparation of individual assessment;
— administration: location(s), identity check and invigilation, assessment discipline, confidentiality/security;
— reporting and documentation provided to the competent authority and/or to the applicant, including sample certificate; and
— retention of documents and records.
(8) The assessment documentation and records should be kept for a period of time determined by the competent authority and made available to the competent authority upon request.
[applicable until 3 August 2024 - ED
Decision 2015/010/R]
(d) The assessment documentation should include at least the
following:
(1) assessment objectives;
(2) assessment layout, timescale, technologies used, assessment
samples, voice samples;
(3) assessment criteria and standards (at least for the
operational, extended and expert levels of the rating scale in Appendix 1 to
Annex I to Regulation (EU) 2015/340);
(4) documentation demonstrating the assessment validity,
relevance and reliability for the operational, extended and expert levels;
(5) procedures to ensure that language assessments are
standardised within the language assessment body and in the ATC community;
(6) assessment procedures and responsibilities, such as:
—
preparation
of individual assessment;
—
administration:
location(s), identity check and invigilation, assessment discipline,
confidentiality/security;
—
reporting
and documentation provided to the competent authority and/or to the applicant,
including sample certificate; and
—
retention of
documents and records.
(7) The assessment documentation and records should be kept for a
period of time determined by the competent authority and made available to the
competent authority upon request.
[applicable from 4 August
2024 - ED Decision 2023/011/R]
EASA regulations require language assessment bodies for air traffic controllers to be transparent, employing qualified assessors. Assessments must have clear objectives, standardized procedures, and documented validity across operational levels. Detailed records must be maintained and accessible to authorities, ensuring consistent language proficiency evaluation within the ATC community.
* Summary by Aviation.Bot - Always consult the original document for the most accurate information.
Loading collections...