AMC9 CAT.OP.MPA.182 Fuel/energy scheme — aerodrome
selection policy — aeroplanes
ED Decision 2023/007/R
BASIC FUEL SCHEME WITH VARIATIONS — PLANNING MINIMA
(a) Variations to the basic fuel schemes in the selection of aerodromes in regard to the planning minima are methods to reduce the meteorological margins based on the established mitigating measures.
(b) As a minimum, the operator should:
(1) use a suitable computerised flight-planning system;
(2) hold an approval for low-visibility approach operations for that fleet; and
(3) have established an operational control system that includes flight monitoring.
(c) Additionally, the operator should select an aerodrome as:
(1) destination alternate aerodrome;
(2) fuel ERA aerodrome; or
(3) isolated destination aerodrome
only when the appropriate weather reports and/or forecasts indicate that the weather conditions will be at or above the planning minima of Table 4 below.
Table 4 — Basic fuel scheme with variations — planning minima
Destination
alternate aerodrome, fuel ERA aerodrome, isolated destination aerodrome
|
Row |
Type of
approach |
Aerodrome
ceiling (cloud base or vertical VIS) |
RVR/VIS |
|
1 |
Two or more usable type B instrument approach operations to two separate runways*** |
DA/H* + 100 ft |
RVR** + 300 m |
|
2 |
One usable type B instrument approach operation |
DA/H + 150 ft |
RVR + 450 m |
|
3 |
DA/H + 200 ft |
RVR/VIS + 800 m |
|
|
4 |
Two or more usable type A instrument approach operations ***, each based on a separate navigation aid |
DA/H or MDA/H* + 200 ft |
RVR/VIS** + 1 000 m |
|
5 |
One usable type A instrument approach operation |
DA/H or MDA/H + 400 ft |
RVR/VIS + 1 500 m |
|
6 |
Circling approach operations |
MDA/H + 400 ft |
VIS + 1 500 m |
|
Crosswind
planning minima: see Table 1 of AMC3 CAT.OP.MPA.182 |
|||
|
Wind limitations should be applied taking into
account the runway condition (dry, wet, contaminated). |
|||
* The higher of the usable DA/H or MDA/H.
** The higher of the usable RVR or VIS.
*** Compliance with point CAT.OP.MPA.182(f) should be ensured.
Note: The operator may select the most convenient planning minima row. For example, aerodrome with two type B approaches: one CAT3 (0 ft/75 m) another CAT1 (200 ft/550 m). The operator may use Row 2 and use CAT3 (0 + 150 ft/75 + 450 m) instead of Row 1 CAT1 (200 + 100 ft/550 + 300 m).
EASA aviation regulations allow operators to reduce meteorological margins for aerodrome selection in fuel planning using a computerised system, low-visibility approach approval, and flight monitoring. Alternate, fuel ERA, or isolated destination aerodromes must meet specific weather minima based on approach type, ceiling, and visibility, as detailed in provided tables.
* Summary by Aviation.Bot - Always consult the original document for the most accurate information.
Loading collections...