AMC4 ORO.FC.232 EBT programme assessment and training
topics
ED Decision 2022/014/R
GENERATION 3 (TURBOPROP) — TABLE OF ASSESSMENT AND TRAINING TOPICS
|
Assessment and training topic |
Frequency |
Description (includes type of topic, being
threat, error or focus) |
Desired outcome (includes performance criteria OR training
outcome) |
Flight phase activation |
Guidance material (GM) Example scenario elements |
PRO |
COM |
FPA |
FPM |
LTW |
PSD |
SAW |
WLM |
KNO |
|||||||
|
Generation
3 Turboprop — Recurrent assessment and training matrix |
Competency map |
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Section 1 — Skill retention. Manoeuvres training
phase (MT) |
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
MT |
Rejected take-off |
A |
Rejected take-off after
the application of take‑off thrust and before reaching V1 (may be
in LVOs or CAT I or above) |
Demonstrate manual aircraft control skills with
smoothness and accuracy as appropriate to the situation. Detect deviations through instrument scanning. Maintain spare mental capacity during manual
aircraft control. Maintain the aircraft within the flight
envelope. Apply knowledge of the relationship between
aircraft attitude, speed and thrust. |
TO |
From initiation of take-off to complete stop (or
as applicable to the procedure) |
x |
|
|
x |
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
|
Failure of the critical engine between V1 and V2 |
A |
Failure of the critical engine from V1 and
before reaching V2 in the lowest CAT I visibility or in LVO meteorological
(MET) conditions. |
TO |
The manoeuvre is complete at a point when the
aircraft is stabilised at normal engine-out climb speed with the correct
pitch and lateral control, in trim condition and, as applicable, autopilot
engagement. Only one failure of the critical engine between V1 and V2 a year
may be done in LVO conditions. |
x |
|
|
x |
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
|
Failure of one engine on take-off |
B |
Failure of one engine from V1 and before
reaching V2 in the lowest CAT I visibility or in LVO MET conditions. |
TO |
The manoeuvre is complete at a point when the
aircraft is stabilised in a clean configuration with engine-out procedures
completed. Only one failure of the critical engine between V1 and V2 a year
may be done in LVO conditions. |
x |
|
|
x |
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
|
Failure of one engine above V2 (any segment of
the TO) in the lowest CAT I visibility or in LVO MET conditions. |
The manoeuvre is complete at a point when the
aircraft is stabilised in a clean configuration with engine-out procedures
completed. |
x |
|
x |
x |
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
|
Emergency descent |
C |
Initiation of emergency descent from normal cruise
altitude |
CRZ |
The manoeuvre is complete once the aircraft is
stabilised in emergency descent configuration (and profile). However, if the
EBT programme does not include the example scenario element ‘emergency
descent’ in the training topic ‘automation management’, the emergency
descent procedures should be completed and should not stop once the aircraft
is stabilised in emergency descent configuration. |
x |
|
x |
x |
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
|
Engine-out approach & landing |
A |
With the critical engine (if applicable) failed,
normal landing |
LDG |
Initiation in a stabilised engine-out
configuration from not less than 3 NM final approach, until completion
of roll-out |
x |
|
|
x |
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
|
Engine-out approach & go-around |
A |
With the critical engine (if applicable) failed,
manually flown normal precision approach to DA, followed by a manual
go-around — the whole manoeuvre to be flown without visual reference |
APP |
This manoeuvre should be flown from intercept to
centreline until acceleration after go-around. The manoeuvre is complete at
a point when the aircraft is stabilised at normal engine-out climb speed
with the correct pitch and lateral control, in trim condition and, as
applicable, autopilot engagement (describe generally the critical part of
the manoeuvre). |
x |
|
|
x |
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
|
Go-around |
A |
Go-around, all engines operative |
APP |
High energy, initiation during the approach at
150 to 300 m (500 to 1 000 ft) below the missed approach
level-off altitude |
x |
|
x |
x |
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
|
Initiation of a go-around from DA followed by
visual circuit and landing |
x |
|
x |
x |
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||
|
During flare/rejected landing |
x |
|
x |
x |
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||
|
Pilot qualification to operate in either pilot’s
seat |
B |
As per ORO.FC.235 |
APP |
Complete the manoeuvres mandated in ORO.FC.235. |
Intentionally left in blank. |
||||||||||||||||
|
Section 2 — Equivalency of approaches relevant
to operations. Evaluation phase, manoeuvres training phase or scenario-based
training phase (EVAL, MT or SBT) |
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
MT |
Approach type A or B |
B |
Approach type A or B flight method 3D |
See equivalency of approaches relevant to
operations that place an additional demand on a proficient crew |
APP |
See equivalency of approaches relevant to
operations |
x |
|
x |
x |
|
|
x |
|
x |
||||||
|
Approach type A |
B |
Approach type A flight method 2D |
See equivalency of approaches relevant to
operations that place an additional demand on a proficient crew |
APP |
See equivalency of approaches relevant to
operations |
x |
|
x |
x |
|
|
x |
|
x |
|||||||
|
EVAL
or SBT |
Approach type A |
B |
Approach type A flight method 3D or 2D |
See equivalency of approaches relevant to
operations that place an additional demand on a proficient crew |
APP |
See equivalency of approaches relevant to
operations |
x |
|
x |
x |
|
|
x |
|
x |
||||||
|
Approach type B |
B |
Approach type B flight method 3D |
See equivalency of approaches relevant to
operations that place an additional demand on a proficient crew |
APP |
See equivalency of approaches relevant to
operations |
x |
|
x |
x |
|
|
x |
|
x |
|||||||
|
Section 3 — Equivalency of approaches under
specific approvals and Take-off under specific approvals. Evaluation phase,
manoeuvres training phase or scenario-based training phase (EVAL, MT or SBT) |
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
MT |
SPA approach(es) |
B |
Approach requiring
specific approval |
See equivalency of approaches relevant to
operations — specific approval |
APP |
Approaches flown from FAF to landing or
go-around |
x |
|
x |
x |
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
|
EVAL or SBT |
SPA approach(es) |
B |
Approach requiring
specific approval |
See equivalency of approaches relevant to
operations — specific approval |
APP |
Approaches flown from FAF to landing or go-around |
x |
|
x |
x |
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
|
EVAL,
MT or SBT |
SPA rejected take-off
(RTO) |
B |
Engine failure after the
application of take-off thrust and before reaching V1 (in low-visibility MET
conditions, preferably in the lowest approved visibility) Low-visibility RTO is
not required under Part SPA but instead in Appendix 9 Section 6. Note: AMC1 SPA.LVO.120
point (f) does not require a low-visibility RTO. RTO is required only in
the initial LVO course (point (g)(1)(iii) of AMC1 SPA.LVO.120). |
Demonstrate manual aircraft control skills with
smoothness and accuracy as appropriate to the situation. Detect deviations through instrument scanning. Maintain spare mental capacity during manual
aircraft control. Maintain the aircraft within the flight
envelope. Apply knowledge of the relationship between
aircraft attitude, speed and thrust. |
TO |
RTO — can be combined with the assessment and
training topic ‘surprise’ in EVAL or SBT |
x |
|
|
x |
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
|
VAL,
MT or SBT |
LVTO |
B |
Notwithstanding AMC1
SPA.LVO120 point (f)(1) AMC1 SPA.LVO.120
requires SPA manoeuvres in the frequency of the OPC, as OPC is substituted
in the EBT programme. Thus, the frequency in EBT is determined in every
cycle (B). Low-visibility take-off,
preferably in the lowest approved visibility |
TO |
The manoeuvre is complete at a point when the
aircraft is stabilised at normal climb speed with the correct pitch and
lateral control, in trim condition and, as applicable, autopilot engagement. |
x |
|
|
x |
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
|
Assessment and training topic |
Frequency |
Flight phase
activation |
Description (includes type of topic, being
threat, error or focus) |
Desired outcome (includes performance criteria OR training
outcome) |
Guidance material (GM) Example scenario elements |
PRO |
COM |
FPA |
FPM |
LTW |
PSD |
SAW |
WLM |
KNO |
|||||||||||
|
Generation 3 Turboprop — Recurrent assessment
and training matrix |
Competency map |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Section 4 — Training topics with frequency (A)
in alphabetical order. Evaluation phase or scenario-based training phase (EVAL
or SBT) |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
EVAL
or SBT |
Adverse weather |
A |
GND |
Thunderstorm, heavy rain, turbulence, ice
build-up to include de-icing issues, as well as high-temperature conditions. The proper use of anti-ice and de-icing systems
should be included generally in appropriate scenarios. |
Anticipate adverse weather. Prepare for suspected adverse weather. Recognise adverse weather. Take appropriate action. Apply the appropriate procedure correctly. Assure aircraft control. |
Predictive wind shear warning before take-off,
as applicable |
x |
x |
|
|
|
x |
|
|
|
||||||||||
|
ALL |
Adverse-weather scenario, e.g. thunderstorm
activity, precipitation, icing |
|
x |
|
|
x |
x |
|
x |
|
|||||||||||||||
|
TO |
Wind shear encounter during take-off, not
predictive |
x |
|
|
x |
|
|
x |
|
x |
|||||||||||||||
|
TO |
Predictive wind shear warning during take-off |
x |
x |
|
|
|
x |
x |
|
|
|||||||||||||||
|
TO |
Crosswinds with or without strong gusts on
take-off |
x |
|
|
x |
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
|
CRZ |
Turbulence that increases to severe turbulence |
|
x |
|
|
x |
|
x |
x |
|
|||||||||||||||
|
CRZ |
Wind shear encounter scenario during cruise |
x |
|
x |
|
|
x |
x |
x |
|
|||||||||||||||
|
APP |
Reactive wind shear warning during approach or
go-around |
x |
|
x |
x |
|
|
x |
|
|
|||||||||||||||
|
APP |
Predictive wind shear warning during approach or
go-around |
x |
x |
|
|
|
x |
x |
|
|
|||||||||||||||
|
APP |
Thunderstorm encounter during approach or on
missed approach |
x |
|
|
|
|
x |
x |
|
|
|||||||||||||||
|
APP |
Increasing tailwind on final approach (not
reported) |
x |
x |
|
|
|
x |
x |
|
|
|||||||||||||||
|
APP |
Approach and landing in demanding weather
conditions, e.g. turbulence, up and downdrafts, gusts and crosswinds
including shifting wind directions |
|
|
|
x |
|
x |
x |
|
|
|||||||||||||||
|
APP |
Non-precision approach in cold-temperature
conditions, requiring altitude compensation for temperature, as applicable
to the type |
x |
x |
|
|
|
|
x |
|
|
|||||||||||||||
|
APP LDG |
Crosswinds with or without strong gusts on
approach, final approach and landing (within and beyond limits) |
x |
|
|
x |
|
x |
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
|
APP |
In approach, unexpected braking action ‘good to
medium’ reported by the preceding aircraft |
|
x |
|
|
|
x |
x |
x |
|
|||||||||||||||
|
APP |
Moderate to severe icing conditions during
approach effecting aircraft performance |
x |
x |
|
|
|
x |
x |
|
|
|||||||||||||||
|
APP |
Reduced visibility even after acquiring the
necessary visual reference during approach, due to rain or fog |
x |
x |
|
|
|
x |
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
|
EVAL
or SBT |
Automation management |
A |
CLB
CRZ DES APP |
The purpose of this topic is to encourage and
develop effective flight path management through proficient and appropriate
use of the flight management system(s), guidance and automation, including
transitions between modes, monitoring, mode awareness, vigilance and
flexibility needed to change from one mode to another. The means of
mitigating errors are included in this topic. The errors are described as
mishandled auto flight systems, inappropriate mode selection, mishandled
flight management system(s) and inappropriate autopilot usage. |
Know how and when to use the flight management
system(s), guidance and automation. Demonstrate correct methods for engagement and
disengagement of the auto flight system(s). Demonstrate appropriate use of flight guidance,
auto thrust and other automation systems. Maintain mode awareness of the auto flight
system(s), including engagement and automatic transitions. Revert to different modes when appropriate. Detect deviations from the desired aircraft
state (flight path, speed, attitude, thrust, etc.) and take appropriate
action. Anticipate mishandled auto flight system. Recognise mishandled auto flight system. Take appropriate action if necessary. Restore correct auto flight state. Identify and manage consequences. |
ACAS warning (resolution advisory), recovery and
subsequent engagement of automation |
x |
|
x |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
|
ALL |
FMS tactical programming issues, e.g. step
climb, runway changes, late clearances, destination re-programming,
executing diversion |
x |
|
x |
|
|
|
|
|
x |
|||||||||||||||
|
CLB
CRZ DES APP |
Recoveries from TAWS, management of energy state
to restore automated flight |
x |
|
x |
x |
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
|
CLB
CRZ DES APP |
Amendments to ATC cleared levels during altitude
capture modes to force mode awareness and intervention |
x |
|
x |
|
|
|
x |
|
|
|||||||||||||||
|
ACAS warning (resolution advisory to level off)
during climb or descent; for example, close to the cleared level when the
capture mode has already been activated. |
x |
|
x |
|
|
|
x |
|
|
||||||||||||||||
|
TO |
Late ATC clearance to an altitude below
acceleration altitude |
x |
|
x |
|
|
|
x |
|
|
|||||||||||||||
|
TO APP |
Engine-out special terrain procedures |
x |
|
x |
|
|
|
x |
|
|
|||||||||||||||
|
CRZ |
Forcing autopilot disconnect followed by
re-engagement, recovery from low- or high-speed events in cruise |
x |
|
x |
x |
|
|
x |
|
|
|||||||||||||||
|
CLB |
Engine failure during or after initial climb using
automation |
x |
|
x |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
|
CRZ |
Engine failure in cruise to onset of descent
using automation |
x |
|
x |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
|
CRZ |
Emergency descent |
x |
|
x |
|
|
|
|
|
x |
|||||||||||||||
|
DES APP |
Managing high-energy descent capturing descent
path from above (correlation with unstable approach training) |
x |
|
x |
|
|
|
x |
|
x |
|||||||||||||||
|
APP |
No ATC clearance received prior to commencement
of approach or final descent |
x |
|
x |
|
|
|
x |
|
|
|||||||||||||||
|
APP |
Reactive wind shear and recovery from the
consequent high-energy state |
x |
|
x |
|
|
|
x |
|
|
|||||||||||||||
|
APP |
Automation fail to capture the approach altitude
in descent (e.g. last altitude before the FAP). Ideally, the failure occurs
when the workload is high (e.g. configuration of the aircraft for final
approach). |
|
|
|
|
x |
x |
x |
x |
|
|||||||||||||||
|
APP |
Non-precision or infrequently flown approaches
using the maximum available level of automation |
x |
|
x |
|
|
|
|
|
x |
|||||||||||||||
|
APP |
Gear malfunction during an approach planned with
autoland (including autobrake). Competency FPA may or may not be included
depending on the impact of such malfunction on the automation. |
|
x |
|
|
|
x |
|
x |
|
|||||||||||||||
|
APP |
ATC clearances to waypoints beyond the
programmed descent point for a coded final descent point during an approach
utilising a final descent that is commanded by the flight management system |
x |
|
x |
|
|
|
x |
|
x |
|||||||||||||||
|
EVAL
or SBT |
Competencies — non-technical (CRM) |
A |
APP |
This encapsulates the general CRM principles and
objectives. It includes communication; leadership and teamwork;
problem-solving and decision-making; situation awareness and management of
information; and workload management. Emphasis should be placed on the development of
leadership, shown by EBT data sources to be a highly effective competency in
mitigating risk and improving safety through pilot performance. |
Exposure to an event or sequence of events to
allow the pilot to build awareness of human factors in aviation and the
human limitations. This includes the development of the following
competencies: Communication: Demonstrate: — effective use of language; — capability to state the plans and
resolve ambiguities. Leadership and teamwork: Use appropriate authority to ensure focus on the
task. Support others in completing tasks. Problem-solving and decision-making: Detect deviations from the desired state,
evaluate problems, identify the risk, consider alternatives and select the
best course of action. Continuously review progress and adjust plans. Situation awareness and management of
information: Have an awareness of the aircraft state in its
environment; project and anticipate changes. Workload management: Prioritise, delegate and receive assistance to
maximise focus on the task. Continuously monitor the flight progress. |
GPS failure prior to commencement of approach
associated with position drift and a terrain alert |
|
|
|
|
x |
x |
x |
|
x |
||||||||||
|
DES |
Cabin crew report of water noise below the
forward galley indicating a possible toilet pipe leak, with consequent
avionics failures |
|
|
|
|
x |
x |
x |
|
|
|||||||||||||||
|
CRZ |
Smoke removal but combined with a diversion
until landing is completed. |
|
x |
|
|
x |
x |
x |
x |
x |
|||||||||||||||
|
GND |
Apron fuel spilling |
|
|
|
|
x |
x |
|
x |
|
|||||||||||||||
|
CRZ |
Important water leak in an aircraft galley |
|
x |
|
|
x |
x |
|
x |
|
|||||||||||||||
|
ALL |
A relevant number of cabin crew are wounded or
incapacitated. Additionally, the cabin crew wounded or incapacitated are the
most competent (e.g. senior cabin crew member). |
|
|
|
|
x |
x |
|
x |
|
|||||||||||||||
|
ALL |
Unruly passenger(s) |
|
|
|
|
x |
|
|
x |
|
|||||||||||||||
|
GND |
Passenger oxygen: passenger service unit open
and mask falling down |
|
|
|
|
x |
x |
|
x |
|
|||||||||||||||
|
ALL |
Passenger with medical problems — medical
emergency |
|
|
|
|
x |
|
|
x |
|
|||||||||||||||
|
CRZ |
Credible threat reported to the crew. Stowaway
or fugitive on board. |
|
x |
|
|
x |
|
x |
x |
|
|||||||||||||||
|
GND |
No METAR or TAFOR is available for destination
due to industrial action at the destination airport |
x |
x |
|
|
x |
x |
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
|
CRZ |
Credible bomb threat reported to crew |
|
x |
|
|
x |
|
x |
x |
|
|||||||||||||||
|
CLB
DES |
Credible bomb threat or pressurisation problem,
but no quick landing possible (due to weather, terrain or other reasons) |
|
x |
|
|
x |
x |
|
x |
|
|||||||||||||||
|
APP |
Diversion with low remaining fuel or increased
fuel flow due to system malfunction |
x |
|
|
|
x |
|
x |
x |
|
|||||||||||||||
|
EVAL
or SBT |
APP |
ACAS warning (resolution advisory) immediately
following a go-around, with a descent manoeuvre required. (The RA should be
a command for descent when the aircraft is above 1 100 ft
AGL.) |
|
x |
|
|
x |
x |
x |
x |
|
||||||||||||||
|
EVAL
or SBT |
Compliance |
A |
ALL |
Compliance failure. Consequences of not
complying with operating instructions (e.g. SOPs). This is not intended to list example scenario
elements, but instructors should ensure that observed non-compliances are
taken as learning opportunities throughout the programme. In all modules of
the programme, the FSTD should as far as possible be treated like an
aircraft, and non-compliances should not be accepted simply for expediency. |
Recognise that a compliance failure has occurred. Make a verbal announcement. Take appropriate action if necessary. Restore safe flight path if necessary. Manage consequences. |
The following are examples of potential
compliance failures and are not intended to be developed as scenarios as
part of an EBT module: 1. Requesting flap beyond limit speed 2. Flaps or slats in the wrong
position for phase of flight or approach 3. Omitting an action as part of a
procedure 4. Failing to initiate or complete a
checklist 5. Using the wrong checklist for the
situation |
Intentionally blank |
||||||||||||||||||
|
EVAL
or SBT |
Go-around management |
A |
APP |
Any threat or error that can result in
circumstances that require a decision to perform a go-around, in addition to
the execution of the go-around. Go-around scenarios should be fully
developed to encourage effective leadership and teamwork, in addition to
problem-solving and decision-making, plus execution using manual aircraft
control or the flight management system(s) and automation as applicable.
Design should include the element of surprise, and scenario-based go-arounds
should not be predictable and anticipated. This topic is completely distinct
from the go-around manoeuvre listed in the MT section that is intended only
to practise psychomotor skills and a simple application of the procedures. |
|
Adverse-weather scenario leading to a reactive
wind shear warning during approach |
x |
x |
|
|
|
|
x |
x |
|
||||||||||
|
APP |
Adverse-weather scenario leading to a predictive
wind shear warning during approach or go-around |
x |
x |
|
|
|
|
x |
x |
|
|||||||||||||||
|
APP |
Adverse-weather scenario, e.g. thunderstorm
activity, heavy precipitation or icing forcing decision at or close to
DA/MDA |
x |
|
|
|
|
x |
x |
x |
|
|||||||||||||||
|
APP |
DA with visual reference in heavy precipitation
with doubt about the runway surface braking capability |
x |
|
|
|
|
x |
x |
x |
|
|||||||||||||||
|
APP |
Adverse-wind scenario resulting in increasing
tailwind below DA (not reported) |
|
x |
|
x |
|
x |
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
|
APP |
Adverse-wind scenario including strong gusts
and/or crosswind out of limits below DA (not reported) |
|
x |
|
x |
|
x |
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
|
APP |
Adverse-wind scenario including strong gusts
and/or crosswind out of limits below 15 m (50 ft) (not reported) |
|
x |
|
x |
|
x |
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
|
APP |
Lost or difficult communications resulting in no
approach clearance prior to commencement of approach or final descent |
x |
|
x |
|
|
|
x |
|
|
|||||||||||||||
|
APP |
Birds: large flocks of birds below DA once
visual reference has been established |
|
|
|
x |
|
x |
x |
|
|
|||||||||||||||
|
APP |
System malfunction, landing gear malfunction
during the approach |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
|
EVAL
or SBT |
Manual aircraft control |
A |
CLB
CRZ DES APP |
Controls the flight path through manual control |
Demonstrate manual aircraft control skills with
smoothness and accuracy as appropriate to the situation. Detect deviations through instrument scanning. Maintain spare mental capacity during manual
aircraft control. Maintain the aircraft within the normal flight
envelope. Apply knowledge of the relationship between
aircraft attitude, speed and thrust. |
Flight with unreliable airspeed, which may or
may not be recoverable |
x |
|
|
x |
|
|
x |
|
x |
||||||||||
|
CLB
CRZ DES APP |
Alternate flight control modes according to
malfunction characteristics |
x |
|
|
x |
|
|
|
x |
x |
|||||||||||||||
|
CLB
CRZ DES APP |
ACAS warning (resolution advisory) requires the
pilot to descend or ATC calls for immediate descent (preferably during climb
which requires a significant change in aircraft attitude) |
x |
x |
|
x |
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
|
ACAS warning (resolution advisory) requires the
pilot to climb or ATC calls for immediate climb (preferably during descent
which requires a significant change in aircraft attitude). |
x |
x |
|
x |
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||
|
DES |
TAWS warning when deviating from planned descent
routing, requiring immediate response |
x |
|
|
x |
x |
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
|
TO |
Scenario immediately after take-off which
requires an immediate and overweight landing |
|
|
x |
x |
x |
x |
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
|
TO |
Adverse wind, crosswinds with or without strong
gusts on take-off |
x |
|
|
x |
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
|
TO |
Adverse weather, wind shear, wind shear
encounter during take-off, with or without reactive warnings |
x |
|
|
x |
|
|
x |
|
|
|||||||||||||||
|
TO |
Engine failure during initial climb, typically
30-60 m (100-200 ft) (autopilot off) |
x |
x |
|
x |
|
|
|
x |
|
|||||||||||||||
|
CRZ |
Wind shear encounter scenario during cruise,
significant and rapid change in wind speed or down/updrafts, without wind
shear warning |
x |
|
x |
|
|
x |
x |
x |
|
|||||||||||||||
|
APP |
Adverse weather, wind shear, wind shear
encounter with or without warning during approach |
x |
|
x |
x |
|
|
x |
|
|
|||||||||||||||
|
APP |
Adverse weather, deterioration in visibility or
cloud base, or adverse wind, requiring a go-around from visual circling
approach, during the visual segment |
x |
x |
x |
x |
|
x |
x |
x |
|
|||||||||||||||
|
APP |
Interception of the glide slope from above
(correlation with unstable approach training) |
|
|
x |
|
|
|
x |
x |
|
|||||||||||||||
|
APP LDG |
Adverse wind, crosswinds with or without strong
gusts on approach, final approach and landing (within and beyond limits) |
x |
|
|
x |
|
x |
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
|
APP LDG |
Adverse weather, adverse wind, approach and landing
in demanding weather conditions, e.g. turbulence, up and downdrafts, gusts
and crosswinds including shifting wind directions |
|
|
|
x |
|
x |
x |
|
|
|||||||||||||||
|
APP LDG |
Circling approach manually flown at night in
minimum in-flight visibility to ensure ground reference, minimum
environmental lighting and no glide slope guidance lights |
x |
|
|
x |
|
|
x |
x |
|
|||||||||||||||
|
APP LDG |
Runway incursion during approach, which can be
triggered by ATC at various altitudes or by visual contact during the
landing phase |
x |
|
|
x |
|
|
x |
|
|
|||||||||||||||
|
LDG |
Adverse wind, visibility, type-specific, special
consideration for long-bodied aircraft, landing in minimum visibility for
visual reference, with crosswind |
x |
x |
|
x |
|
|
x |
|
|
|||||||||||||||
|
LDG |
System malfunction, auto flight failure at DA
during a low-visibility approach requiring a go-around flown manually |
x |
|
x |
x |
|
|
x |
|
|
|||||||||||||||
|
APP LDG |
Approach planned with autoland, followed by a
failure below 1 000 ft requiring a manual go-around and an
immediate landing due to fuel shortage |
x |
|
x |
|
x |
|
x |
|
|
|||||||||||||||
|
TO |
In-seat instruction: Insufficient engine failure recovery, forcing
the pilot monitoring to take over the flight controls |
|
x |
|
x |
|
|
x |
x |
|
|||||||||||||||
|
APP LDG |
In-seat instruction: Unstable approach on short final or long
landing, forcing the pilot monitoring to take over the flight controls |
|
x |
|
x |
|
|
x |
x |
|
|||||||||||||||
|
EVAL
or SBT |
Monitoring, cross-checking, error management,
mismanaged aircraft state |
A |
ALL |
The scenarios should be realistic and relevant,
and should be used for the purpose of demonstration and reinforcement of
effective monitoring. Modules in the FSTD should be treated like those
in an aircraft so that trainees have the opportunity to develop the
competency with the practice of the right techniques and attitudes related
to these topics through pilot performance, and that instructors have the
opportunity to assess and train these topics in a realistic environment. As
shown by the EBT data report, these topics are of key importance to improve
safety in operations. In addition, the operator may also use these
topics to develop scripted role-playing scenarios in the form of ISI. These
scenarios cater for the need to monitor flight path excursions from the
instructor pilot (PF), detect errors and make appropriate interventions,
either verbally or by taking control as applicable. Demonstration scenarios
may also be used. Demonstrated role-play should contain realistic and not
gross errors, leading at times to a mismanaged aircraft state, which can
also be combined with upset management training. |
Recognise mismanaged aircraft state. Observe the pilot’s behaviour: how the pilot is
mitigating errors, performing cross-checking, monitoring performance and
dealing with a mismanaged aircraft state, in order to ensure that observed
deviations, errors and mistakes are taken as learning opportunities
throughout the programme. Monitor flight path excursions. Detect errors and threats through proper
cross-checking performance. Make appropriate interventions either verbally
or by taking control if applicable. Take appropriate action if necessary. Restore the desired aircraft state. Identify and manage consequences. |
Deviations from the flight path, in pitch
attitude, speed, altitude, bank angle |
|
x |
|
|
|
|
x |
|
|
||||||||||
|
ALL |
In-seat instruction: Simple automation errors (e.g. incorrect mode selection,
attempted engagement without the necessary conditions, entering wrong
altitude or speed, failure to execute the desired mode) culminating in a
need for direct intervention from the pilot monitoring, and where necessary
taking control. |
|
x |
|
|
|
|
x |
|
|
|||||||||||||||
|
APP |
In-seat instruction: Unstable approach or speed/path/vertical rate
not congruent with the required state for the given flight condition |
x |
x |
|
|
|
|
x |
x |
|
|||||||||||||||
|
LDG |
In-seat instruction: Demonstration exercise — recovery from bounced
landing, adverse wind, strong gusts during landing phase, resulting in a
bounce and necessitating recovery action from the pilot monitoring |
x |
|
|
x |
|
|
x |
|
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Unstable approach |
A |
DES APP |
Reinforce stabilised approach philosophy and
adherence to defined parameters. Encourage go-arounds when crews are outside
these parameters. Develop and sustain competencies related to the management
of high-energy situations. |
|
ATC or terrain-related environment creating a
high-energy descent with the need to capture the optimum profile to complete
the approach in a stabilised configuration |
x |
|
x |
|
|
|
x |
|
|
|||||||||||
|
DES APP |
ATC or terrain-related environment creating a
high-energy descent leading to unstable conditions and requiring a go-around |
x |
|
x |
|
|
|
x |
|
|
|||||||||||||||
|
APP |
Approach and landing in demanding weather
conditions, e.g. turbulence, up and downdrafts, gusts and crosswinds
including shifting wind directions |
|
|
|
x |
|
x |
x |
|
|
|||||||||||||||
|
APP |
Increasing tailwind on final approach (not
reported) |
x |
x |
|
|
|
x |
x |
|
|
|||||||||||||||
|
APP LDG |
Crosswinds with or without strong gusts on
approach, final approach and landing (within and beyond limits) |
x |
|
|
x |
|
x |
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Section 5 — UPRT training topic with frequency
(B). Evaluation phase, manoeuvres training phase or scenario-based training
phase (EVAL, MT or SBT) |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
EVAL,
MT or SBT |
Upset prevention
training |
B |
N/A |
Compliance with AMC1 or AMC2 to
ORO.FC.220&230 Include upset prevention elements in Table 1 for
the recurrent training programme in at least every cycle, such that all the
elements are covered over a period not exceeding 3 years. The elements are
numbered with letters from A to I in Table 1 of AMC1 ORO.FC.220&230.
Each element is made up of several numbered components. According to the principles of EBT, covering one
component should satisfy the requirement to cover the whole element of
recognising and preventing the development of upset conditions. |
Early recognition and prevention of upset
conditions. When the differences between LHS and RHS are not
significant in the handling of the aircraft, UPRT may be conducted in either
seat. |
See Table 1 of AMC1 ORO.FC.220&230: Elements
and respective components of upset prevention training. |
Intentionally blank |
||||||||||||||||||
|
CRZ |
Demonstration of the defined normal flight
envelope and any associated changes in flight instruments, flight director
systems, and protection systems. This should take the form of an instructor-led
exercise to show the crew the points beyond which an upset condition could
exist. |
|
|
x |
|
|
|
|
x |
x |
|||||||||||||||
|
TO APP |
Severe wind shear or wake turbulence during
take-off or approach |
|
|
x |
x |
|
x |
x |
|
|
|||||||||||||||
|
CRZ |
As applicable and relevant to the aircraft type,
demonstration at a suitable intermediate level, with turbulence as
appropriate; practise steep turns and note the relationship between bank
angle, pitch and stalling speed |
|
|
|
x |
|
|
x |
|
x |
|||||||||||||||
|
CRZ |
At the maximum cruise flight level for the
current aircraft weight, turbulence to trigger overspeed conditions (if FSTD
capability exists, consider use of the vertical wind component to add
realism) |
x |
|
x |
x |
|
|
x |
|
|
|||||||||||||||
|
CRZ |
At the maximum cruise flight level for the
current aircraft weight, turbulence and significant temperature rise to
trigger low-speed conditions (if FSTD capability exists, consider use of the
vertical wind component to add realism) |
|
|
x |
x |
|
|
x |
|
x |
|||||||||||||||
|
CRZ |
High-altitude loss of reliable airspeed |
x |
x |
|
x |
|
|
x |
x |
|
|||||||||||||||
|
CRZ |
High-altitude ACAS RA (where the
RA is required to be flown in manual flight) |
x |
|
|
x |
|
|
x |
x |
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Section 6 — Training topics with frequency (B)
in alphabetical order. Evaluation phase or scenario-based training phase
(EVAL or SBT) |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
EVAL
or SBT |
Aircraft system malfunctions, including
operations under MEL |
B |
ALL |
Any internal failure(s) apparent or not apparent
to the crew Any item cleared by the MEL but having an impact
upon flight operations — for instance, thrust reverser locked. Malfunctions to be considered should have one or
more of the following characteristics: Immediacy Complexity Degradation of aircraft control Loss of primary instrumentation Management of consequences The operator should vary malfunctions for each
characteristic over the EBT cycle. Unless specified otherwise in the operational
suitability data, at least one malfunction with each characteristic should
be included in every cycle. Combining characteristics should not reduce the
number of malfunctions below seven for each cycle. For each crew member, the
characteristics of degraded control and loss of instrumentation should be in
the role of pilot flying and the others may be in the role of pilot flying
or pilot monitoring. For full details, see the malfunction
equivalency methodology. |
Recognise system malfunction. Take appropriate action including correct
stop/go decision. Apply the appropriate procedure correctly. Maintain aircraft control. Manage consequences. Apply crew operating procedures where necessary.
Respond appropriately to additional system
abnormalities associated with MEL dispatch. |
(i) System malfunctions that require immediate
and urgent crew intervention or decision, e.g. fire, smoke, loss of
pressurisation at high altitude, failures during take-off, brake failure
during landing. (ii) System malfunctions that require complex
procedures, e.g. multiple hydraulic system failures, smoke and fumes
procedures, major electrical system failure. (iii) System malfunctions that result in
significant degradation of flight controls in combination with abnormal
handling characteristics, e.g. jammed flight controls, certain degradation
of FBW control, jammed horizontal stabiliser; flaps and/or slats locked;
other malfunctions that result in degraded flight controls. (iv) System failures that require monitoring and
management of the flight path using degraded or alternative displays,
unreliable primary flight path information, unreliable airspeed, e.g. flight
with unreliable airspeed (v) System failures that require extensive
management of their consequences (independent of operation or environment),
e.g. fuel leak. |
Intentionally blank |
||||||||||||||||||
|
TO |
MEL items with crew operating procedures
applicable during take-off |
|
|
|
|
|
x |
|
|
x |
|||||||||||||||
|
TO |
Response to an additional factor that is
affected by an MEL item (e.g. system failure, runway state) |
|
x |
|
x |
|
x |
|
|
x |
|||||||||||||||
|
GND |
Malfunction during preflight preparation and
prior to departure |
x |
|
|
|
|
x |
x |
|
|
|||||||||||||||
|
CLB |
Malfunction after departure |
x |
|
|
|
|
x |
x |
|
x |
|||||||||||||||
|
ALL |
Malfunctions that require immediate attention
(e.g. bleed fault during engine start, hydraulic failure during taxi) |
x |
|
|
|
x |
|
|
x |
|
|||||||||||||||
|
CLB
CRZ |
Fuel leak (management of consequences) |
x |
|
|
|
x |
|
x |
|
x |
|||||||||||||||
|
TO |
Malfunction on take-off high speed below V1 |
x |
|
|
|
x |
x |
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
|
TO |
Malfunction on take-off high speed above V1 |
x |
|
|
|
|
x |
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
|
GND |
During taxi to the runway, a spurious brake
temperature announcement. The crew had the correct brake temperature moments
before the failure. |
|
|
|
|
x |
x |
x |
|
|
|||||||||||||||
|
TO |
Tyre failure during take-off |
|
|
|
|
x |
x |
|
x |
|
|||||||||||||||
|
TO |
Malfunction on initial climb |
x |
|
|
|
|
x |
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
|
APP |
Malfunction on approach |
x |
|
|
|
|
x |
|
x |
|
|||||||||||||||
|
APP |
Malfunction on go-around |
x |
|
|
|
|
x |
|
x |
|
|||||||||||||||
|
LDG |
Malfunction during landing |
x |
x |
|
x |
|
x |
x |
|
|
|||||||||||||||
|
EVAL
or SBT |
Aircraft system management |
B |
|
Normal system operation according to defined
instructions |
This is not considered as a stand-alone topic.
It is linked with the topic ‘compliance’. Where a system is not managed according to
normal or defined procedures, this is determined as a non-compliance. |
See ‘compliance’ topic above. There are no
defined scenarios, but the instructor should focus on learning opportunities
when system management non-compliances manifest themselves during other
scenarios. Underpinning knowledge of systems and their interactions should
be developed and challenged, and not merely the application of normal
procedures. |
Intentionally blank |
x |
|||||||||||||||||
|
CRZ
APP LDG |
Minimum fuel, caused by extended delays,
weather, etc. where the crew would need to manage a minimum fuel situation |
|
|
|
|
x |
x |
x |
x |
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Approach, visibility close to minimum |
B |
APP |
Any situation where visibility becomes a threat |
Recognise actual conditions. Observe aircraft and/or procedural limitations. Apply the appropriate procedures if applicable. Maintain directional control and safe flight
path. |
Approach in poor visibility |
x |
|
x |
x |
|
|
|
x |
|
|||||||||||
|
APP |
Approach in poor visibility with deteriorations
necessitating a decision to perform a go-around |
x |
|
x |
x |
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
|
LDG |
Landing in poor visibility |
|
|
|
x |
|
x |
x |
|
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Landing |
B |
LDG |
Pilots should have opportunities to practise
landings in demanding situations at the defined frequency. Data indicates
that landing problems have their roots in a variety of factors, including
inappropriate decision-making, in addition to manual aircraft control skills
if difficult environmental conditions exist. The purpose of this item is to
ensure that pilots are exposed to this during the programme. |
Landing in demanding environmental conditions,
with malfunctions as appropriate |
This topic should be combined with the
adverse-weather topic, aircraft system malfunctions topic or any topic that
can provide exposure to a landing in demanding conditions. |
Intentionally blank |
|||||||||||||||||||
|
EVAL
or SBT |
Surprise |
B |
ALL |
The data analysed during the development of the
EBT concept indicated substantial difficulties encountered by crews when
faced with a threat or error, which was a surprise or an unexpected event.
The element of surprise should be distinguished from what is sometimes
referred to as the ‘startle factor’ — the latter being a physiological
reaction. Wherever possible, consideration should be given towards
variations in the types of scenario, times of occurrences and types of
occurrence, so that pilots do not become overly familiar with repetitions of
the same scenarios. Variations should be the focus of EBT programme design,
and not left to the discretion of individual instructors, in order to
preserve programme integrity and fairness. |
Exposure to an unexpected event or sequence of
events at the defined frequency in order to build resilience. |
Rejected take-off |
x |
|
|
x |
|
x |
|
|
|
||||||||||
|
Intentionally blank |
Intentionally blank |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
EVAL
or SBT |
Terrain |
B |
ALL |
Alert, warning, or conflict |
Anticipate terrain threats. Prepare for terrain threats. Recognise unsafe terrain clearance. Take appropriate action. Apply the appropriate procedures correctly. Maintain aircraft control. Restore safe flight path. Manage consequences. |
ATC clearance giving insufficient terrain
clearance |
x |
x |
|
|
x |
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
|
ALL |
Demonstration of terrain avoidance warning
systems (TAWS) (this scenario element may be done in an ISI.) |
|
|
|
|
|
x |
x |
x |
|
|||||||||||||||
|
TO CLB |
Engine failure where performance is marginal
leading to TAWS warning |
|
x |
|
x |
|
|
|
x |
|
|||||||||||||||
|
DES
APP |
ATC provides a wrong QNH |
|
x |
|
|
|
|
x |
|
|
|||||||||||||||
|
DES |
‘Virtual mountain’ refers to the surprise
element of an unexpected warning. Care should be exercised in creating a
level of realism, so this can best be achieved by an unusual and unexpected
change of route during the descent. |
|
|
|
|
|
x |
x |
x |
|
|||||||||||||||
|
EVAL
or SBT |
Wind shear recovery |
B |
TO |
With or without warnings including predictive. A
wind shear scenario is ideally combined with an adverse-weather scenario
containing other elements. |
Anticipate potential for wind shear. Avoid known wind shear or prepare for suspected
wind shear. Recognise wind shear encounter. Take appropriate action. Apply the appropriate procedure correctly. Assure aircraft control. Recognise out of wind shear condition. Maintain or restore a safe flight path. Assess consequential issues and manage outcomes. |
Predictive wind shear warning during take-off |
|
|
|
|
x |
x |
|
|
|
||||||||||
|
TO |
Wind shear encounter during take-off |
x |
|
|
|
x |
x |
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
|
TO |
Wind shear encounter after rotation |
|
|
|
|
|
x |
|
x |
|
|||||||||||||||
|
TO |
Predictive wind shear after rotation |
|
|
|
|
x |
x |
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
|
APP |
Predictive wind shear during approach |
x |
|
|
|
x |
x |
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
|
APP |
Wind shear encounter during go-around |
x |
|
|
|
x |
x |
|
x |
|
|||||||||||||||
|
APP |
Wind shear encounter during approach |
x |
|
|
|
x |
x |
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Workload, distraction, pressure, stress |
B |
ALL |
This is not considered a topic for specific
attention on its own, but more as a reminder to programme developers to
ensure that pilots are exposed to immersive training scenarios which expose
them to manageable high workload and distractions during the course of the
EBT programme, at the defined frequency. |
Manage available resources efficiently to
prioritise and perform tasks in a timely manner under all circumstances. |
Intentionally blank |
Intentionally blank |
|||||||||||||||||||
|
Section 7 — UPRT Upset recovery training topic
with frequency (C). Manoeuvres training phase or scenario-based training
phase (MT or SBT) |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
MT or
SBT |
Upset recovery |
C |
N/A |
Compliance with AMC1 or AMC2 to
ORO.FC.220&230 Include the recovery exercises in Table 2 of
AMC1 ORO.FC.220&230 for the recurrent training programme, such that all
the exercises are covered over a period not exceeding 3 years. According to
the principles of EBT, covering one component should satisfy the requirement
to cover the whole element of recovery from developed upsets. The same
principles apply to the exercises of components 2, 3 and 4 where one
exercise may satisfy the requirement to cover the whole component. An aeroplane upset is defined as an undesired
aeroplane state in flight characterised by unintentional divergences from
parameters normally experienced during line operations or training. An
aeroplane upset may involve pitch and/or bank angle divergences as well as
inappropriate airspeeds for the conditions. |
Recognise upset condition. Make timely and appropriate intervention. Take appropriate action. Assure timely and appropriate intervention.
(AMC1 ORO.FC.220&230 Table 2 component 1) Assure aircraft control. Maintain or restore a safe flight path. Assess consequential issues. Manage outcomes. Consolidate the summary of aeroplane recovery
techniques. (AMC1 ORO.FC.220&230 Table 2 component 5) Note: The operator should assess if the
exercises should be practised for the either seat qualification. |
The example scenario elements may be done in
ISI, as non-ISI or a combination of both. If done in ISI: The instructor should position
the aircraft within but close to the edge of the validated training envelope
before handing control to the trainee to demonstrate the restoration of
normal flight. Careful consideration should be given to flying within the
validated training envelope. |
Intentionally blank |
||||||||||||||||||
|
Table 2 of AMC1 ORO.FC.220&230: Exercises
for upset recovery training |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
A. |
Recovery from developed upsets |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
CLB DES |
2. |
Recovery from stall events in the following
configurations: take-off configuration, clean configuration low altitude, clean configuration near maximum operating
altitude, and landing configuration during the approach phase. |
x |
|
|
x |
|
|
x |
x |
|
||||||||||||||
|
CRZ |
3. |
Recovery from nose high at various bank angles |
x |
|
|
x |
|
|
x |
x |
|
||||||||||||||
|
CRZ |
4. |
Recovery from nose low at various bank angles |
x |
|
|
x |
|
|
x |
x |
|
||||||||||||||
|
CRZ |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
APP |
Demonstration at a normal cruising altitude. Set
conditions and disable aircraft systems as necessary to enable trainee to
perform stall recovery according to OEM instructions. |
x |
|
|
x |
|
|
x |
|
|
|||||||||||||||
|
CLB DES |
Demonstration at an intermediate altitude during
early stages of the approach. Set conditions and disable aircraft systems as
necessary to enable trainee to perform stall recovery according to OEM
instructions. |
x |
|
|
x |
|
|
x |
|
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Recovery from a wake turbulence position with
high-bank angle |
x |
|
x |
x |
|
|
x |
|
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Section 8 — Training topics with frequency (C)
in alphabetical order. Evaluation phase or scenario-based training phase
(EVAL or SBT) |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
EVAL
or SBT |
Adverse wind |
C |
TO |
Adverse wind/crosswind. This includes tailwind
but not ATC mis-reporting of the actual wind. |
Recognise adverse-wind conditions. Observe limitations. Apply the appropriate procedures. Maintain directional control and safe flight
path. |
Take-off with different crosswind/tailwind/gust
conditions |
|
|
|
|
|
x |
|
x |
|
||||||||||
|
TO |
Take-off with unreported tailwind |
|
x |
|
|
x |
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
|
TO |
Crosswinds with or without strong gusts on
take-off |
x |
|
|
x |
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
|
APP |
Wind exceeding limits on final approach (not
reported) |
x |
x |
|
|
|
x |
x |
|
|
|||||||||||||||
|
APP |
Wind exceeding limits on final approach
(reported) in manual aircraft control |
x |
x |
|
x |
|
x |
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
|
APP |
Increasing tailwind on final approach (not
reported) |
x |
x |
|
|
|
x |
x |
|
|
|||||||||||||||
|
APP |
Approach and landing in demanding weather
conditions, e.g. turbulence, up and downdrafts, gusts and crosswind
including shifting wind directions |
|
|
|
x |
|
x |
x |
|
|
|||||||||||||||
|
APP |
Adverse-wind scenario resulting in increasing
tailwind below DA (not reported) |
|
x |
|
x |
|
x |
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
|
APP |
Adverse-wind scenario including strong gusts
and/or crosswind out of limits below DA (not reported) |
|
x |
|
x |
|
x |
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
|
APP |
Adverse-wind scenario including strong gusts
and/or crosswind out of limits below 15 m (50 ft) (not reported) |
|
x |
|
x |
|
x |
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
|
APP LDG |
Crosswind with or without strong gusts on
approach, final approach and landing (within and beyond limits) |
x |
|
|
x |
|
x |
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
|
EVAL
or SBT |
ATC |
C |
ALL |
ATC error. Omission, miscommunication, garbled,
poor quality transmission. All these act as distractions to be managed by
the crew. The scenarios should be combined, where possible, with others of
the same or higher weighting, the principal reason being to create
distractions. |
Respond to communications appropriately. Recognise, clarify and resolve any ambiguities. Refuse or question unsafe instructions. Use standard phraseology whenever possible. |
ATC role-play: the instructor provides scripted instructions,
as a distraction to the crew |
x |
x |
|
|
x |
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
|
ALL |
Controller error, provided by the instructor
according to a defined scripted scenario |
x |
x |
|
|
|
x |
x |
|
|
|||||||||||||||
|
ALL |
Frequency congestion, with multiple aircraft
using the same frequency |
|
x |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
|
APP |
Destination temporarily closed |
|
|
|
|
x |
x |
x |
x |
|
|||||||||||||||
|
CRZ |
Rescue and firefighting services (RFFS) level
reduction at destination |
|
x |
|
|
x |
|
x |
|
|
|||||||||||||||
|
APP |
Runway change before the interception of the
localiser or similar navigation aid in azimuth |
|
|
x |
|
x |
|
x |
x |
|
|||||||||||||||
|
GND TO |
Stray dogs at the opposite threshold runway |
|
x |
|
|
x |
|
x |
|
|
|||||||||||||||
|
ALL |
Poor quality transmissions |
|
x |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
|
EVAL
or SBT |
Engine failure |
C |
TO |
Any engine failure or malfunction, which causes
loss or degradation of thrust that affects performance. This is distinct
from the engine-out manoeuvres described in the MT section above, which are
intended only to practise psychomotor skills and reinforce procedures to
manage engine failures. |
Recognise engine failure. Take appropriate action. Apply the appropriate procedure correctly. Maintain aircraft control. Manage consequences. |
Engine failure or engine malfunction on take-off
low speed |
x |
|
|
x |
|
x |
|
x |
|
||||||||||
|
TO |
Engine failure or engine malfunction on take-off
high speed below V1 |
x |
|
|
x |
|
x |
|
x |
|
|||||||||||||||
|
TO |
Engine failure or engine malfunction on take-off
above V1 |
x |
|
|
|
|
x |
x |
x |
|
|||||||||||||||
|
TO |
Engine failure or engine malfunction on initial
climb |
x |
|
|
|
|
x |
x |
|
|
|||||||||||||||
|
APP |
Engine malfunction |
x |
|
|
|
|
x |
|
x |
|
|||||||||||||||
|
CRZ |
Engine failure in cruise (with autopilot) |
x |
|
x |
|
|
|
x |
|
|
|||||||||||||||
|
LDG |
Engine failure or engine malfunction on landing |
|
|
|
x |
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
|
EVAL
or SBT |
Fire and smoke
management |
C |
GND |
This includes
engine, electric, pneumatic, cargo fire, smoke or fumes. |
Recognise fire,
smoke or fumes. Take appropriate
action. Apply the
appropriate procedure correctly. Maintain aircraft
control. Manage
consequences. |
Fire in cargo or
cabin/cockpit at gate |
x |
x |
|
|
|
x |
|
x |
|
||||||||||
|
GND |
Fire during taxi |
x |
x |
|
|
|
x |
|
x |
x |
|||||||||||||||
|
GND |
Fire with no
cockpit indication |
x |
x |
|
|
|
x |
|
x |
x |
|||||||||||||||
|
TO |
Take-off low
speed |
x |
|
|
x |
x |
x |
|
|
x |
|||||||||||||||
|
TO |
Fire or smoke on
take-off high speed below V1 |
x |
|
|
x |
x |
x |
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
|
TO |
Fire or smoke on
take-off high speed above V1 |
x |
|
|
|
x |
x |
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
|
TO |
Fire or smoke on
initial climb |
x |
|
|
|
x |
x |
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
|
CRZ |
Cargo fire |
|
|
|
|
|
x |
x |
x |
|
|||||||||||||||
|
APP |
Engine fire in
approach (extinguishable) |
|
x |
|
|
|
x |
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
|
APP |
Engine fire in
approach (non-extinguishable) |
|
x |
|
|
x |
x |
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
|
CLB CRZ DES |
Lithium battery
fire in the cockpit or cabin compartment |
x |
x |
|
|
x |
x |
|
x |
|
|||||||||||||||
|
APP |
Flight deck or cabin fire |
|
x |
|
|
x |
x |
|
|
x |
|||||||||||||||
|
GND |
Any of the example scenario elements above
ending in an evacuation |
|
x |
|
|
x |
x |
|
x |
|
|||||||||||||||
|
EVAL
or SBT |
Loss of communications |
C |
GND |
Lost or difficult communications due to either
pilot mis-selection or a failure external to the aircraft. This could be for
a few seconds or a total loss. |
Recognise loss of communications. Take appropriate action. Execute the appropriate procedure as applicable. Use alternative ways to communicate. Manage consequences. |
Loss of communications during ground manoeuvring |
x |
x |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
|
TO |
Loss of communications after take-off |
x |
|
|
|
|
x |
|
|
x |
|||||||||||||||
|
APP |
Loss of communications during approach phase, including
go-around |
x |
x |
|
|
|
x |
x |
|
x |
|||||||||||||||
|
EVAL
or SBT |
Managing loading, fuel, performance errors |
C |
ALL |
A calculation error by one or more pilots, or
someone involved with the process, or the process itself, e.g. incorrect
information on the load sheet |
Anticipate the potential for errors in
load/fuel/performance data. Recognise inconsistencies. Manage/avoid distractions. Make changes to paperwork/aircraft system(s) to
eliminate error. Identify and manage consequences. |
This can be a demonstrated error, in that the
crew may be instructed to deliberately insert incorrect data — for example,
to take off from an intersection with full-length performance information.
The crew will be asked to intervene when acceleration is sensed to be lower
than normal, and this may be part of the operator procedures, especially
when operating mixed fleets with considerable variations in MTOM. |
x |
x |
|
|
|
|
|
x |
|
||||||||||
|
GND |
Fuel ground staff on industrial action. Only
limited amount of fuel available, which is below the calculated fuel for the
flight. |
|
|
|
|
x |
x |
x |
x |
|
|||||||||||||||
|
GND |
Advise crew that there is a change of the load
sheet figures during taxi to the runway. The crew may have limited time due
to a calculated take-off time (CTOT) — ATC slot. |
x |
|
|
|
|
|
|
x |
|
|||||||||||||||
|
GND |
Braking action reported ‘medium’. The
information is transmitted just before take-off. The flight is subject to a
(CTOT) — ATC slot. |
|
|
|
|
x |
|
x |
x |
|
|||||||||||||||
|
EVAL
or SBT |
Navigation |
C |
GND |
External NAV failure. Loss of GPS satellite, ANP exceeding RNP, loss
of external NAV source(s) |
Recognise a NAV degradation. Take appropriate action. Execute the appropriate procedure as applicable. Use alternative NAV guidance. Manage consequences. |
External failure or a combination of external
failures degrading aircraft navigation performance on ground |
x |
|
x |
|
|
x |
x |
|
|
||||||||||
|
TO CLB
APP LDG |
External failure or a combination of external
failures degrading aircraft navigation performance in flight |
|
x |
|
|
x |
x |
x |
|
|
|||||||||||||||
|
GND |
Standard initial departure change during taxi.
The flight may be subject to a CTOT — ATC slot. |
|
|
|
|
x |
|
x |
x |
|
|||||||||||||||
|
APP |
Loss of runway lighting below decision height |
|
x |
|
|
|
x |
x |
|
|
|||||||||||||||
|
CRZ |
No fly zone: when the crew changes control
frequency, the new ATCO informs the crew that they are flying over an
unannounced ‘no fly zone’ that is not included in the NOTAMs. (To trigger
such an event, the context may be as follows: an unexpected military
conflict in the territory the aircraft is flying over or the crew is forced
to re-route in flight and the new route flies over a city that has an
important event such the Olympic games, a G20/G7 submit, or the route is
flying near a space rocket launch close to the time of the launch, like the
Guiana Space Centre, Cape Cañaveral, etc.). |
|
|
|
|
x |
x |
x |
|
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Operations- or type-specific |
C |
ALL |
Intentionally blank |
Intentionally blank |
Intentionally blank |
Intentionally blank |
|||||||||||||||||||
|
Operations of special airport approval |
C |
APP LDG |
See equivalency of approaches relevant to
operations. |
The operator should comply with the national
qualification requirements published in the Aeronautical Information
Publication. |
Intentionally blank |
Intentionally blank |
|||||||||||||||||||
|
EVAL
or SBT |
Pilot incapacitation |
C |
TO |
Consequences for the non-incapacitated pilot |
Recognise incapacitation. Take appropriate action including correct
stop/go decision. Apply the appropriate procedure correctly. Maintain aircraft control. Manage consequences. |
During take-off |
x |
x |
|
|
x |
x |
|
|
x |
||||||||||
|
APP |
During approach |
x |
|
|
x |
|
|
|
x |
x |
|||||||||||||||
|
Runway or taxiway condition |
C |
GND TO
LDG |
Contamination or surface quality of the runway,
taxiway, or tarmac including foreign objects |
Recognise hazardous runway condition. Observe limitations. Take appropriate action. Apply the appropriate procedures correctly. Assure aircraft control. |
Planned anticipated hazardous conditions with
dispatch information provided to facilitate planning and execution of
appropriate procedures |
|
|
|
|
|
x |
|
|
x |
|||||||||||
|
GND TO
LDG |
Unanticipated hazardous conditions, e.g.
unexpected heavy rain resulting in flooded runway surface |
|
x |
|
|
x |
x |
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
|
TO |
Take-off on runway with reduced cleared width
due to snow |
x |
|
|
x |
x |
|
x |
|
|
|||||||||||||||
|
TO |
Stop/go decision in hazardous conditions |
|
|
|
|
x |
x |
|
x |
|
|||||||||||||||
|
EVAL
or SBT |
Traffic |
C |
CLB
CRZ DES |
Traffic conflict. ACAS RA or TA, or visual
observation of conflict, which requires evasive manoeuvring |
Anticipate potential loss of separation. Recognise loss of separation. Take appropriate action. Apply the appropriate procedure correctly. Maintain aircraft control. Manage consequences. |
ACAS warning that requires crew intervention |
|
x |
|
|
|
x |
x |
x |
|
||||||||||
|
Dilemma: Visual acquisition of conflicting
traffic followed by an ACAS warning (resolution advisory) triggered by the
same or other traffic. Even if the traffic is in sight, the pilot should
follow the RA. |
X |
|
x |
X |
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||
|
While in descent, ACAS warning (traffic
advisory) of an aircraft below. The crew should not initiate an avoidance
manoeuvre based on TA (except decreasing the rate of descent unless
otherwise instructed by ATC, etc.). This example scenario can be done during
climb with conflicting traffic above. |
x |
|
|
|
x |
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||
END GEN3
TURBOPROP
EASA regulations for turboprop air operations emphasize recurrent pilot training and assessment using Evidence-Based Training (EBT). Key areas include skill retention, approach equivalency, specific approvals, adverse weather, automation, CRM, compliance, go-around management, manual control, monitoring, upset prevention/recovery, system malfunctions, visibility, landing techniques, surprise events, terrain awareness, wind shear recovery, and workload management.
* Summary by Aviation.Bot - Always consult the original document for the most accurate information.
Loading collections...