AMC2 SPA.LVO.120(b) Flight
crew competence
ED
Decision 2023/007/R
INITIAL
TRAINING AND CHECKING FOR SA CAT I, CAT II, SA CAT II AND CAT III APPROACH OPERATIONS
Operators
should ensure that flight crew members complete the following training and
checking before being authorised to conduct SA CAT I, CAT II, SA CAT II and CAT III approach operations unless credits related
to training and checking for previous experience on similar aircraft types are
defined in the operational suitability data established in accordance with Regulation (EU) No 748/2012:
(a) For flight crew members who do not have
previous experience of low-visibility approach operations requiring an
approval under this Subpart with an EU operator:
(1) A course of ground training including at
least the following:
(i) characteristics and limitations of
different types of approach aids;
(ii) characteristics of the visual aids;
(iii) characteristics of fog;
(iv) operational capabilities and limitations
of airborne systems to include symbology used on HUD/HUDLS or equivalent
display systems, if appropriate;
(v) effects of precipitation, ice accretion,
low level wind shear and turbulence;
(vi) the effect of specific aircraft/system
malfunctions;
(vii) the use and limitations of RVR assessment
systems;
(viii) principles of obstacle clearance
requirements;
(ix) the recognition of failure of ground
equipment or in satellite approaches, the loss of signal in space and the action
to be taken in the event of such failures;
(x) procedures to be followed and precautions
to be taken with regard to surface movement during operations when the RVR is
400 m or less and any additional procedures required for take-off in
conditions below 150 m;
(xi) the significance of DHs based upon radio
altimeters and the effect of terrain profile in the approach area on radio
altimeter readings and on automatic approach/landing systems. This applies also
to other devices capable of providing equivalent information;
(xii) the effect of the pre-threshold terrain and
LSAA on airborne landing systems;
(xiii) the significance of alert height, if
applicable, and action in the event of any failure above and below the alert
height;
(xiv) qualification requirements for pilots to
obtain and retain approval to conduct LVOs;
(xv) the importance of correct seating and eye
position; and
(xvi) the significance of LVPs or equivalent
procedures.
(2) A course of FSTD training and/or flight
training in two phases as follows:
(i) Phase one (LVOs with aircraft and all equipment
serviceable) — objectives
(A) understand the operation of equipment
required for LVOs;
(B) understand the operating limitations
resulting from airworthiness certification;
(C) practise the monitoring of automatic
flight control systems and status annunciators;
(D) practise the use of HUD/HUDLS or
equivalent display systems, where appropriate;
(E) understand the significance of alert
height, if applicable;
(F) become familiar with the maximum lateral
and vertical deviation permitted for different types of approach operation;
(G) become familiar with the visual references
required at DH;
(H) master the manual aircraft handling
relevant to low-visibility approach operations;
(I) practise coordination with other crew
members; and
(J) become proficient at procedures for
low-visibility approach operations with serviceable equipment.
(ii) Phase one of the training should include
the following exercises:
(A) the required checks for satisfactory
functioning of equipment, both on the ground and in flight;
(B) the use of HUD/HUDLS or equivalent display
systems during all phases of flight, if applicable;
(C) approach using the appropriate flight
guidance, autopilots, and control systems installed on the aircraft to the
appropriate DH and transition to visual flight and landing;
(D) approach with all engines operating using
the appropriate flight guidance, autopilots and control systems installed on
the aircraft, including HUD/HUDLS or equivalent display systems, down to the
appropriate DH followed by a missed approach, all without external visual
reference;
(E) where appropriate, approaches using
autopilot to provide automatic flare, hover, landing and roll-out; and
(F) where appropriate, approaches using
approved HUD/HUDLS or equivalent display system to touchdown.
(iii) Phase two (low-visibility approach
operations with aircraft and equipment failures and degradations) — objectives
(A) understand the effect of known aircraft
unserviceability including use of the MEL;
(B) understand the effect of failed or
downgraded equipment on aerodrome operating minima;
(C) understand the actions required in
response to failures and changes in the status of automatic flight
control/guidance systems including HUD/HUDLS or equivalent display systems;
(D) understand the actions required in
response to failures above and below alert height, if applicable;
(E) practise abnormal operations and
incapacitation procedures; and
(F) become proficient at dealing with failures
and abnormal situations during low-visibility approach operations.
(iv) Phase two of the training should include
the following exercises:
(A) approaches with engine failures at various
stages of the approach;
(B) approaches with critical equipment
failures, such as electrical systems, auto‑flight systems, ground or airborne approach
aids and status monitors;
(C) approaches where failures of auto-flight
or flight guidance systems, including HUDLS or equivalent display systems,
require either:
(a) reversion to manual control for landing
or go-around; or
(b) reversion to manual control or a
downgraded automatic mode control for go-around from the DH or below,
including those which may result in contact with the runway.
This should
include aircraft handling if, during a CAT III fail-passive approach, a fault causes
autopilot to disconnect at or below the DH when the last reported RVR is
300 m or less;
(D) failures of systems that will result in
excessive lateral or vertical deviation both above and below the DH in the
minimum visual conditions for the operation;
(E) incapacitation procedures appropriate to
low-visibility approach operations; and
(F) failures and procedures applicable to the
specific aircraft type.
(v) FSTD training should include:
(A) for approaches flown using HUDLS or
equivalent display systems, a minimum of eight approaches;
(B) otherwise, a minimum of six approaches.
(vi) For aircraft for which no FSTDs
representing the specific aircraft are available, operators should ensure that
the flight training phase specific to the visual scenarios of low-visibility
approach operations is conducted in a specifically approved FSTD. Such
training should include a minimum of four approaches. Thereafter,
type-specific training should be conducted in the aircraft.
(3) A check requiring the completion of at
least the following exercises in an aircraft or FSTD:
(i) Low-visibility approaches in simulated
instrument flight conditions down to the applicable DH, using the flight
guidance system. Standard procedures of crew coordination (task sharing,
call-out procedures, mutual surveillance, information exchange and support)
should be observed. For CAT III operations, the operator should use an FSTD approved for this
purpose;
(ii) Go-around after approaches as indicated in
(2) at any point between 500 ft above ground level (AGL) and on reaching the DH; and
(iii) Landing(s) with visual reference
established at the DH following an instrument approach. Depending on the
specific flight guidance system, an automatic landing should be performed.
(4) For operators for which LIFUS is required
by Part-ORO, practice in approaches during LIFUS, as follows:
(i) For low-visibility approach operations
using a manual landing:
(A) if a HUDLS or equivalent display system is
used to touchdown, four landings, or if the training required by (a)(2) was
conducted in an FSTD qualified for zero flight-time training (ZFTT), two
landings;
(B) otherwise, three landings, or if the
training required by (a)(2) was conducted in an FSTD qualified for ZFTT, one
landing;
(ii) For low-visibility operations using
autoland:
(A) if the training required by (a)(2) was
conducted in an FSTD qualified for ZFTT, one landing, or none if the fight
crew member successfully completed a type rating based on ZFTT;
(B) otherwise, two landings.
(b) For flight crew members who have previous
experience of low-visibility approach operations requiring an approval under
this Subpart with an EU operator, when changing to an aircraft for which a new
class or type rating is required, within the same operator:
(1) A course of ground training as specified
in (a)(1), taking into account the flight crew member’s existing knowledge of
low-visibility approach operations.
(2) A course of FSTD and/or flight training,
as specified in (a)(2) above. If the flight crew member’s previous experience
of low-visibility approach operations is on a type where the following were
the same or similar:
(i) the technology used in the flight
guidance and flight control system;
(ii) operating procedures;
(iii) handling characteristics; and
(iv) the use of HUD/HUDLS or equivalent display
systems,
then the
flight crew member may complete an abbreviated course of FSTD and/or flight
training.
(3) An abbreviated course should meet the
objectives described in (a)(2), it does not need to include the number of approaches required by
(a)(2)(v), but should include at least the following number of landings:
(i) if a HUDLS or an equivalent display
system is utilised to touchdown, then four approaches including a landing at
the lowest approved RVR and a go-around; or
(ii) otherwise, two approaches including a
landing at the lowest approved RVR and a go-around.
(c) For flight crew members who have previous
experience of low-visibility approach operations requiring an approval under
this Subpart with an EU operator, when joining another operator:
(1) A course of ground training as specified
in (a)(1), taking into account the flight crew member’s existing knowledge of
low-visibility approach operations.
(2) A course of FSTD and/or flight training as
specified in (a)(2) above. If the flight crew member’s previous experience of
low-visibility approach operations is on the same aircraft type and variant,
or on a different type or variant where the following were the same or
similar:
(i) the technology used in the flight
guidance and flight control system;
(ii) operating procedures;
(iii) handling characteristics; and
(iv) the use of HUD/HUDLS or equivalent display
systems,
then the
flight crew member may complete an abbreviated course of FSTD and/or flight
training. Such an abbreviated course should meet the objectives described in
(a)(2), it does not need
to include the number
of approaches required by (a)(2)(v), but should include at least the following
number of landings:
(A) if a HUDLS or an equivalent display system
is utilised to touchdown, then four approaches including a landing at the
lowest approved RVR and a go-around; or
(B) otherwise, two approaches including a
landing at the lowest approved RVR and a go-around.
(3) Practice in approaches during LIFUS as
required by (a)(3) above unless the flight crew member’s previous experience
of low-visibility approach operations is on the same aircraft type and
variant.
EASA regulations mandate comprehensive flight crew training for low visibility operations (LVO) like CAT I/II/III approaches. Training includes ground school, simulator sessions covering normal/abnormal scenarios, and aircraft checks. Experienced pilots may qualify for abbreviated courses based on prior LVO experience and aircraft similarity. Landings during line flying under supervision are also required.
* Summary by Aviation.Bot - Always consult the original document for the most accurate information.
Loading collections...