AMC2 NCO.OP.110 Aerodrome operating
minima — aeroplanes and helicopters
ED Decision 2023/007/R
RVR OR VIS FOR INSTRUMENT APPROACH OPERATIONS — DETERMINATION OF DH/MDH FOR INSTRUMENT APPROACH OPERATIONS — AEROPLANES
(a) The RVR (or for non-instrument runways, VIS) for straight-in instrument approach operations should not be less than the greatest of the following:
(1) the minimum RVR (or for non-instrument runways, VIS) for the type of runway used according to Table 1;
(2) the minimum RVR determined according to the MDH or DH and class of lighting facility according to Table 2;
(3) the minimum RVR according to the visual and non-visual aids and on-board equipment used according to Table 3.
(b) For Category A and B aeroplanes, if the RVR determined in accordance with (a) is greater than 1 500 m, then 1 500 m should be used.
(c) The visual aids, if available, may comprise standard runway day markings, runway edge lights, threshold lights, runway end lights and approach lights as defined in Table 6.
(d) For night operations or for any operation where credit for visual aids is required, the lights should be on and serviceable except as provided for in GM5 NCO.OP.110.
Table 1
Type of
runway versus minimum RVR or VIS — aeroplanes
|
Type of runway |
Minimum
RVR or VIS (m) |
|
Precision approach (PA) runway, category I |
550 |
|
Non-precision approach (NPA) runway |
750 |
|
Non-instrument runway |
Visibility according to Table 1 in NCO.OP.112 (Circling minima) |
Table 2
RVR versus DH/MDH
|
DH
or MDH |
Class
of lighting facility |
|||||
|
FALS |
IALS |
BALS |
NALS |
|||
|
ft |
RVR
(m) |
|||||
|
200 |
- |
210 |
550 |
750 |
1 000 |
1 200 |
|
211 |
- |
240 |
550 |
800 |
1 000 |
1 200 |
|
241 |
- |
250 |
550 |
800 |
1 000 |
1 300 |
|
251 |
- |
260 |
600 |
800 |
1 100 |
1 300 |
|
261 |
- |
280 |
600 |
900 |
1 100 |
1 300 |
|
281 |
- |
300 |
650 |
900 |
1 200 |
1 400 |
|
301 |
- |
320 |
700 |
1 000 |
1 200 |
1 400 |
|
321 |
- |
340 |
800 |
1 100 |
1 300 |
1 500 |
|
341 |
- |
360 |
900 |
1 200 |
1 400 |
1 600 |
|
361 |
- |
380 |
1 000 |
1 300 |
1 500 |
1 700 |
|
381 |
- |
400 |
1 100 |
1 400 |
1 600 |
1 800 |
|
401 |
- |
420 |
1 200 |
1 500 |
1 700 |
1 900 |
|
421 |
- |
440 |
1 300 |
1 600 |
1 800 |
2 000 |
|
441 |
- |
460 |
1 400 |
1 700 |
1 900 |
2 100 |
|
461 |
- |
480 |
1 500 |
1 800 |
2 000 |
2 200 |
|
481 |
- |
500 |
1 500 |
1 800 |
2 100 |
2 300 |
|
501 |
- |
520 |
1 600 |
1 900 |
2 100 |
2 400 |
|
521 |
- |
540 |
1 700 |
2 000 |
2 200 |
2 400 |
|
541 |
- |
560 |
1 800 |
2 100 |
2 300 |
2 400 |
|
561 |
- |
580 |
1 900 |
2 200 |
2 400 |
2 400 |
|
581 |
- |
600 |
2 000 |
2 300 |
2 400 |
2 400 |
|
601 |
- |
620 |
2 100 |
2 400 |
2 400 |
2 400 |
|
621 |
- |
640 |
2 200 |
2 400 |
2 400 |
2 400 |
|
641 |
- |
660 |
2 300 |
2 400 |
2 400 |
2 400 |
|
661 |
and above |
2 400 |
2 400 |
2 400 |
2 400 |
|
Table 3
Visual and
non-visual aids and/or on-board equipment versus minimum RVR — aeroplanes
|
Type
of approach |
Facilities |
Lowest RVR (m) |
|
PA and APV procedure |
RTZL and RCLL |
[no limitation] |
|
without RTZL and RCLL but using HUDLS or equivalent system; coupled autopilot or flight director to DH |
[no limitation] |
|
|
No RTZL and RCLL, not using HUDLS or equivalent system or autopilot to DH. |
750 |
|
|
NPA procedure |
Final approach track offset <15 o for category A and B aeroplanes or <5 o Category C and D aeroplanes |
750 |
|
Final approach track offset ³ 15o for category A or B aeroplanes |
1 000 |
|
|
Final approach track offset ³ 5o for category C or D aeroplanes |
1 200 |
DETERMINATION OF RVR FOR INSTRUMENT APPROACH OPERATIONS — HELICOPTERS
(e) For IFR operations, the RVR should not be less than the greatest of the following:
(1) the minimum RVR for the type of runway/FATO used according to Table 4; or
(2) the minimum RVR determined according to the MDH or DH and class of lighting facility according to Table 5;
(3) for PinS operations with instructions to ‘proceed visually’, the distance between the MAPt of the PinS and the FATO/approach light system.
(f) For PinS operations with instructions to ‘proceed VFR’, the VIS should be compatible with visual flight rules.
(g) The visual aids, if available, may comprise standard runway day markings, runway edge lights, threshold lights, runway, end lights and approach lights as defined in Table 6.
(h) For night operations or for any operation where credit for visual aids is required, the lights should be on and serviceable.
Table 4
Type of runway/FATO versus minimum RVR
— helicopters
|
Type of runway/FATO |
Minimum RVR or VIS (m) |
|
PA runway, category I NPA runway Non-instrument runway |
RVR 550 |
|
Instrument FATO FATO |
RVR 550 RVR or VIS 800 |
Table 5
DH/MDH versus minimum RVR — helicopters
|
DH/MDH (ft) |
Facilities
versus RVR (m)* |
|||
|
FALS |
IALS |
BALS |
NALS |
|
|
200 |
550 |
600 |
700 |
1 000 |
|
201–249 |
550 |
650 |
750 |
1 000 |
|
250–299 |
600* |
700* |
800 |
1 000 |
|
300 and above |
750* |
800 |
900 |
1 000 |
* Minima on 2D approach operations should be no lower than 800 m.
APPROACH LIGHTING SYSTEMS — AEROPLANES AND HELICOPTERS
Table 6
Approach lighting systems
|
Class
of lighting facility |
Length, configuration
and intensity of approach lights |
|
FALS |
CAT I lighting system (HIALS ≥720 m) distance coded centre line, barrette centre line |
|
IALS |
Simple approach lighting system (HIALS 420–719 m) single source, barrette |
|
BALS |
Any other approach lighting system (HIALS, MALS or ALS 210–419 m) |
|
NALS |
Any other approach lighting system (HIALS, MALS or ALS <210 m) or no approach lights |
EASA regulations mandate minimum RVR or visibility for aircraft instrument approaches based on runway type, lighting, and equipment. Aeroplane RVR is determined by runway category, decision height, and visual aids. Helicopter RVR considers runway/FATO type, decision height, and approach lighting. Visual aids must be operational during night or when credited.
* Summary by Aviation.Bot - Always consult the original document for the most accurate information.
Loading collections...