ED Decision 2017/023/R
DETERMINING WHETHER A FLIGHT NEEDS TO BE TRACKED
Table 1 provides a summary of the cases applicable to an aeroplane which is within the scope of CAT.GEN.MPA.205(a).
Table 1: Cases applicable to the flight of an aeroplane subject to the aircraft tracking requirement
Condition 1: The planned route and the planned diversion routes are included in airspace blocks where ATS surveillance service is normally provided. |
Condition 2: The ATS surveillance service provided in all airspace blocks determined by Condition 1 is supported by ATC surveillance systems locating the aircraft at time intervals with adequate duration. |
Condition 3: The operator has provided all air navigation service providers competent for the airspace blocks determined by Condition 1 with the necessary contact information. |
Case considered: Aeroplane that is within the scope of CAT.GEN.MPA.205(a).
|
Conditions 1, 2 and 3 are met altogether. |
The flight does not need to be tracked (refer to CAT.GEN.MPA.205(b)). Note: The operator should check at regular time intervals that Conditions 1, 2 and 3 are still met (refer to AMC2 CAT.GEN.MPA.205). |
||
Either Condition 1, Condition 2 or Condition 3 is not met. |
The flight shall be tracked (refer to CAT.GEN.MPA.205(b)). Note: Lack of aircraft tracking data due to a temporary or unexpected issue may be acceptable (refer to AMC1 CAT.GEN.MPA.205). Examples of issues (list is indicative and not exhaustive): airborne equipment found inoperative, transmission link disturbed by environmental factors; issue with the ground-based infrastructure or the space-based infrastructure. |
||
Guidance on when an aeroplane flight needs tracking: all three conditions (ATS surveillance, ATC system adequacy, ANSP contact) must be met to avoid tracking; otherwise tracking is required.
* Summary by Aviation.Bot - Always consult the original document for the most accurate information.
Loading collections...