Who defines how the trained and checked procedures complement each other?

The operator defines this in AMC1 ORO.FC.330.

GM1 ORO.FC.330 Recurrent training and checking -- operator proficiency check

Q: Can a single check cover multiple training elements in the context of the operator proficiency check?

Yes, it may happen that several training elements are covered by a single check.

Navigate / EASA

Ask question Discover more Add to collection

GM1 ORO.FC.330 Recurrent training and checking — operator proficiency check

ED Decision 2022/014/R

SPO — RELEVANT PROCEDURES TO BE TRAINED AND CHECKED

The procedures to be trained in the aircraft/FSTD may be different from the procedures to be checked if both complement each other, as defined by the operator in AMC1 ORO.FC.330, considering the following:

(a) It may happen that several training elements are covered by a single check; and

(b) Certain complex procedures are best explored under recurrent training, where the trainee will derive more benefit and training to proficiency is also employed.

Details

Source-Title: GM1 ORO.FC.330 Recurrent training and checking -- operator proficiency check View latest amendments

Erulesid: ERULES-1963177438-20180 Compare versions

Domain: Air operations

Applicabilitydate: 26 March, 2023

Entryintoforcedate: 20 August, 2022

Regulatorysource: ED Decision 2022/014/R Navigate

Regulatorysubject: Part-ORO

Typeofcontent: GM to IR (Guidance material to implementing rule)

Parentir: ORO.FC.330 Recurrent training and checking -- operator proficiency check

Origin: EASA

Category: EAR