ED Decision 2022/012/R
DETERMINATION OF DH/MDH FOR INSTRUMENT APPROACH OPERATIONS — HELICOPTERS
(a) The DH or MDH to be used for a 3D or a 2D approach operation should not be lower than the highest of:
(1) the OCH for the category of aircraft;
(2) the published approach procedure DH or MDH where applicable;
(3) the system minima specified in Table 6;
(4) the minimum DH permitted for the runway/FATO specified in Table 7, if applicable; or
(5) the minimum DH specified in the AFM or equivalent document, if stated.
Table 6
System minima — helicopters
Facility |
Lowest DH/MDH (ft) |
ILS/MLS/GLS |
200 |
GNSS/SBAS (LPV)* |
200 |
Precision approach radar (PAR) |
200 |
GNSS/SBAS (LP) |
250 |
GNSS (LNAV) |
250 |
GNSS/Baro VNAV (LNAV/VNAV) |
250 |
Helicopter PinS approach |
250** |
LOC with or without DME |
250 |
SRA (terminating at ½ NM) |
250 |
SRA (terminating at 1 NM) |
300 |
SRA (terminating at 2 NM or more) |
350 |
VOR |
300 |
VOR/DME |
250 |
NDB |
350 |
NDB/DME |
300 |
VDF |
350 |
* For LPV, a DH of 200 ft may be used only if the published FAS datablock sets a vertical alert limit not exceeding 35 m. Otherwise, the DH should not be lower than 250 ft.
** For PinS approaches with instructions to ‘proceed VFR’ to an undefined or virtual destination, the DH or MDH should be with reference to the ground below the missed approach point (MAPt).
Table 7
Type of runway/FATO versus lowest DH/MDH — helicopters
Type of runway/FATO |
Lowest DH/MDH (ft) |
Precision approach (PA) runway, category I Non-precision approach (NPA) runway Non-instrument runway |
200 |
Instrument FATO FATO |
200 250 |
Table 7 does not apply to helicopter PinS approaches with instructions to ‘proceed VFR’.
EASA AMC4 CAT.OP.MPA.110 sets helicopter DH/MDH minima, combining OCH, published minima, system tables, runway/FATO types, and AFM limits. Includes ILS, GNSS, VOR, NDB, and PinS specifics.
* Summary by Aviation.Bot - Always consult the original document for the most accurate information.
Loading collections...