Appendix B to
AMC 20-21 Examples of Typical EZAP Worksheets
ED Decision 2008/007/R
The following worksheets are provided as an example to assist implementation of the EZAP logic explained in this AMC. These may be adjusted by the analyst to suit specific applications.
1. Details of Zone.
2. Assessment of Zone Attributes.
3A. Inspection Level Determination based on Rating Tables (for use where a dedicated ZIP exists).
3B. Inspection Level Determination based on Rating Tables (for use where no dedicated ZIP exists).
4. Interval Determination based on Rating Tables.
5. Task Summary.
In particular, the interval ranges quoted in the rating table on Sheet 4 are solely to explain a typical arrangement of values. For a particular application, these must be compatible with the interval framework used in the existing maintenance or inspection programme. They may be expressed in terms of usage parameter (e.g. flight hours or calendar time) or in terms of letter check (as in the example).
[Amdt AMC/4]
These EASA guidelines offer examples for implementing Enhanced Zonal Analysis Procedure (EZAP) logic. Worksheets assist in determining inspection levels and intervals based on zone attributes, considering factors like size, fire risk, and wiring proximity to controls. Analysts must tailor these examples to specific aircraft maintenance programs.
* Summary by Aviation.Bot - Always consult the original document for the most accurate information.
Loading collections...